The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Social Phobia and Social Interaction Anxiety Scales: Evaluation of Psychometric Properties
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The scale demonstrates good internal consistency (α = .91) and correlates highly with other measures of social phobia (Osman et al., 1998).”
From Attentional bias and emotional reactivity as predictors and moderators of behavioral treatment for social phobia (2013) · cites this paper as Osman et al., 1998
In the citing paper
“The scale demonstrates good internal consistency (α = .90) and correlates highly with other measures of social phobia (Osman, Gutierrez, Barrios, Kopper, & Chiros, 1998).”
From Attentional bias and emotional reactivity as predictors and moderators of behavioral treatment for social phobia (2013) · cites this paper as Osman et al., 1998
In the citing paper
“The scale demonstrates good internal consistency (α = .91) and correlates highly with other measures of social phobia (Osman et al., 1998).”
From Attentional bias and emotional reactivity as predictors and moderators of behavioral treatment for social phobia (2013) · cites this paper as Osman et al., 1998
In the citing paper
“The scale demonstrates good internal consistency (α = .90) and correlates highly with other measures of social phobia (Osman, Gutierrez, Barrios, Kopper, & Chiros, 1998).”
From Attentional bias and emotional reactivity as predictors and moderators of behavioral treatment for social phobia (2013) · cites this paper as Osman et al., 1998
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Williams, J. B. W., & First, M. B. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104 · Cited by 109,845
Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests
Cronbach, L. J. (1951) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02310555 · Cited by 43,931
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005 · Cited by 27,200
(1970) · Cited by 24,983
Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 · Cited by 20,015
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd ed
Cooper, A. M., & Michels, R. (1981) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.138.1.128 · Cited by 7,419
Akaike, H. (1987) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02294359 · Cited by 5,264
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd ed
Kendell, R. E. (1980) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.137.12.1630 · Cited by 5,181
Akaike, H. (1987) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0_29 · Cited by 4,027
Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size.
Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.391 · Cited by 3,953
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Bentler, P. M., & Wu, E. J. C. (1997). EQS Structural Equations Program, Version 5.6. Encino: Multivariate Software.
- Carmines, E. G., & McLver, J. (1981). Analyzing models with unobserved variables: Analysis of covariance structures. In G. W. Bohrnstedt & E. F. Borgatta (Eds.), Social measurement: Current issues. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Derogatis, L. R. (1992). The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI): Administration, scoring, and procedures manual II. Baltimore, MD: Clinical Psychometric Research.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Peters, L., Sunderland, M., Andrews, G., Rapee, R. M., & Mattick, R. P. (2012) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0024544 · Cited by 379
Rodebaugh, T. L., Woods, C. M., & Heimberg, R. G. (2007) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2006.08.001 · Cited by 370
Social anxiety in young people: A prevalence study in seven countries
Jefferies, P., & Ungar, M. T. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0239133 · Cited by 413
Anxiety symptomatology: the association with distress tolerance and anxiety sensitivity
Keough, M. E., Riccardi, C. J., Timpano, K. R., Mitchell, M. A., & Schmidt, N. B. (2010) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2010.04.002 · Cited by 284
Eng, W., Heimberg, R. G., Hart, T. A., Schneier, F. R., & Liebowitz, M. R. (2001) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/1528-3542.1.4.365 · Cited by 296
Metadata
- Authors
- Osman, A., Gutierrez, P. M., Barrios, F. X., Kopper, B. A., & Chiros, C. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Northern Iowa (US)
- Northern Illinois University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Osman, Augustine
- Venue
- Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
- Published
- 1998-09
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 249-264
- ISSN
- 0164-0305 (ISSN-L)
- 0882-2689
- 1573-3505
- OpenAlex
- W198347847
- Cited by
- 142
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 1.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment (publishedVersion)
- UNI ScholarWorks (University of Northern Iowa) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Keywords
- social anxiety disorder, Social Interaction Anxiety Scale, Social Phobia Scale, self-report measures, factor structure, psychometric properties, internal consistency, gender differences, social desirability, concurrent validity, measurement invariance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review