Cited by 5,264Psychometric Methodologies and TestingStatistical Methods and ApplicationsStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference

Factor Analysis and AIC

Akaike, Hirotugu·1987·Psychometrika

Abstract

The information criterion AIC was introduced to extend the method of maximum likelihood to the multimodel situation. It was obtained by relating the successful experience of the order determination of an autoregressive model to the determination of the number of factors in the maximum likelihood factor analysis. The use of the AIC criterion in the factor analysis is particularly interesting when it is viewed as the choice of a Bayesian model. This observation shows that the area of application of AIC can be much wider than the conventional i.i.d. type models on which the original derivation of the criterion was based. The observation of the Bayesian structure of the factor analysis model leads us to the handling of the problem of improper solution by introducing a natural prior distribution of factor loadings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02294359

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The AIC was used for model comparison, with the smallest value indicating the most parsimonious model.

    “The Akaike Information Criterion (AIC; Akaike, 1987) was used for the purposes of model comparison, with the smallest value being indicative of the most parsimonious model (Byrne, 2012).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Akaike, H.
Affiliations
The Institute of Statistical Mathematics (JP)
Corresponding author
Akaike, Hirotugu
Venue
Psychometrika
Published
1987-09
Volume
52
Issue
3
Pages
317-332
ISSN
  • 0033-3123 (ISSN-L)
  • 1860-0980
OpenAlex
W4237377395
Cited by
5,264
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 201 · 2025: 260 · 2024: 262 · 2023: 277 · 2022: 254 · 2021: 269 · 2020: 255 · 2019: 289 · 2018: 276 · 2017: 275 · 2016: 244 · 2015: 262 · 2014: 249 · 2013: 207 · 2012: 203
FWCI
9.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychometrika (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Keywords
Akaike information criterion, factor analysis, model selection, Bayesian model, number of factors, factor loadings, prior distributions, improper solutions, maximum likelihood estimation, autoregressive model order selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review