CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 273Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyLanguage Development and Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Listening Comprehension and Working Memory Are Impaired in Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Irrespective of Language Impairment

McInnes, Alison, Humphries, Tom, Hogg-Johnson, Sheilah, Tannock, Rosemary·2003·Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
DOI 10.1023/a:1023895602957
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study investigated listening comprehension and working memory abilities in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), presenting with and without language impairments (LI). A 4-group design classified a community sample (n = 77) of boys aged 9-12 into ADHD, ADHD + LI, LI, and Normal groups. Children completed tests of basic language and cognitive skills, verbal and spatial working memory, and passage-level listening comprehension. Multivariate analyses and post hoc comparisons indicated that ADHD children who did not have co-occurring LI comprehended factual information from spoken passages as well as normal children, but were poorer at comprehending inferences and monitoring comprehension of instructions. ADHD children did not differ from normal children in verbal span, but showed significantly poorer verbal working memory, spatial span, and spatial working memory. The ADHD + LI and LI groups were most impaired in listening comprehension and working memory performance, but did not differ from each other. Listening comprehension skills were significantly correlated with both verbal and spatial working memory, and parent-teacher ratings of inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity. Findings that children with ADHD but no LI showed subtle higher-level listening comprehension deficits have implications for both current diagnostic practices and conceptualizations of ADHD.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1023895602957

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 61 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Adams, W., & Sheslow, D. (1990). Wide range assessment of memory and llearning. Wilmington, Delaware: Wide Rang.
  2. Chall, J. (1995). Dale Chall Readability—Revisited. The Dale Chall Readability Formula. New York: Brookline Books.
  3. Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1997). The Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test—III (3rd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
  4. Martinussen, R., & McInnes, A. (2001). Visual spatial memory in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Subtype differences and stimulant effects. Poster presented at the Society for Research in Child Development Biennial Meeting, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
  5. Sahakian, B. J., & Owen, A. M. (1992). Computerized assessment in neuropsychiatry using CANTAB. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 85, 399–402.
  6. Semel, E. M., Wiig, E. H., & Secord, W. (1995). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals—III, San Antonio, Texas: The Psychological Corporation, Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
  7. Tannock, R., Hum, M., Masellis, M., Humphries, T., & Schachar, R. (2000). Children's Academic Performance, Attention, Behavior, and Learning Evaluation: Teacher Telephone Interview (CAPABLE-TTI). Presented at the annual conference of American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, New York City.
  8. Wechsler, D. (1991). The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Third edition, San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
  9. Williams, K. T. (1997). Expressive Vocabulary Test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
  10. Woodcock, R. W. (1987).Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests—Revised, Austin, TX: DLM Teaching Resources.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 272

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
McInnes, A., Humphries, T., Hogg-Johnson, S., & Tannock, R.
Affiliations
Hospital for Sick Children (CA)
Corresponding author
Tannock, Rosemary
ORCID
McInnes, Alison
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2003-08
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
427-443
ISSN
  • 0091-0627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2835
DOI
10.1023/a:1023895602957
OpenAlex
W2158227210
Cited by
273
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 21
FWCI
6.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Hospital for Sick Children
  • Medical Research Council Canada
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, language impairment, listening comprehension, working memory, verbal working memory, spatial working memory, children, inference, inattention, hyperactivity/impulsivity
MeSH terms
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Humans, Language Disorders, Male, Memory Disorders, Perceptual Disorders, Severity of Illness Index, Speech Perception, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review