Against Vague Existence
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ted Sider (2003) has supplied arguments that existence cannot be vague.
“First, we would simply like to point out that Ted Sider (2003) has supplied arguments that existence cannot be vague.”
From What Becomes of a Causal Set? (2017) · cites this paper as Sider (2003)
Cites
Putnam, H. (1981) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511625398 · Cited by 5,626 · see citing works
New work for a theory of universals
Lewis, D. (1983) · Australasian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/00048408312341131 · Cited by 3,140 · see citing works
Four-Dimensionalism: An Ontology of Persistence and Time
Sider, T. (2001) · doi:10.1093/019924443x.001.0001 · Cited by 1,907 · see citing works
Self-citationWittgenstein on Rules and Private Language.
Peacocke, C., & Kripke, S. A. (1984) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2184586 · Cited by 1,429 · see citing works
Putnam, H. (1983) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511625275 · Cited by 920 · see citing works
Lewis, D. (1984) · Australasian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/00048408412340013 · Cited by 826 · see citing works
Meaning and the Moral Sciences.
Turner, S., & Putnam, H. (1979) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2065182 · Cited by 796 · see citing works
Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language: An Elementary Exposition
Kripke, S. A. (1982) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 754 · see citing works
Putnam, H. (1980) · Journal of Symbolic Logic · doi:10.2307/2273415 · Cited by 646 · see citing works
Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology
Sosa, E., & Lewis, D. (2000) · The Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.2307/2678398 · Cited by 424 · see citing works
Parthood and Identity Across Time
Thomson, J. J. (1983) · The Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.2307/2026004 · Cited by 388 · see citing works
QUANTIFIER VARIANCE AND REALISM
Hirsch, E. (2002) · Philosophical Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1758-2237.2002.tb00061.x · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Philosophical Perspectives, Metaphysics
Hawthorne, J. T., & Turner, J. (2012) · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Sosa, E. (1987) · Philosophical Perspectives · doi:10.2307/2214145 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Realism and Reason: Philosophical Papers Volume 3
Putnam, H. (1985) · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wüthrich, C., & Callender, C. (2017) · The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1093/bjps/axv040 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sider, T.
- Affiliations
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sider, Theodore
- ORCID
- Sider, Theodore
- Venue
- Philosophical Studies
- Published
- 2003-05
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 135-146
- ISSN
- 0031-8116 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0883
- OpenAlex
- W161882535
- Cited by
- 107
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 32.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Philosophical Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
- Keywords
- vagueness, existence, metaphysics of vagueness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review