Cited by 88Land Rights and ReformsConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementAgriculture, Land Use, Rural Development

Land reform and land-use changes in the lower Amazon: implications for agricultural intensification

Futemma, Célia, Brondízio, Eduardo S.·2003·Human Ecology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1025067721480

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Futemma, C., & Brondízio, E. S.
Affiliations
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
Brondízio, Eduardo S.
Venue
Human Ecology
Published
2003-09
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
369-402
ISSN
  • 0300-7839 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9915
OpenAlex
W149452934
Cited by
88
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
7.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Human Ecology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Land Rights and Reforms
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Keywords
land reform, land tenure, land use change, agricultural intensification, forest conservation, deforestation, Lower Amazon, cropland expansion, labor availability, land abandonment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review