The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Usability Meanings and Interpretations in ISO Standards
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This was beneficial to understand learnability [32], which is an indicator of how easily the ASHAs performed tasks as well as efficiency [33], which is an analysis of the ASHA’s ability to quickly perform the task they have learnt.”
From Engineering a mobile health tool for resource-poor settings to assess and manage cardiovascular disease risk: SMARThealth study (2015) · cites this paper as [32]
Citations
Cites
(1993) · Cited by 9,879
Carayannis, E. G. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_100431 · Cited by 4,819
Usability Evaluation In Industry
(1996) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781498710411 · Cited by 4,445
(1987) · Andalas University Repository (Andalas University) · Cited by 1,584
(2003) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780367804787 · Cited by 1,227
Characteristics of software quality
(1980) · Mathematics and Computers in Simulation · doi:10.1016/0378-4754(80)90076-2 · Cited by 835
Bevan, N., Kirakowski, J., & Maissel, J. (1991) · Cited by 219
The Usability Engineering Framework for Product Design and Evaluation
Wixon, D. R., & Wilson, C. E. (1997) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-044481862-1.50093-5 · Cited by 125
Human-Computer Interaction Standards
Bevan, N. (1995) · Advances in human factors/ergonomics · doi:10.1016/s0921-2647(06)80326-6 · Cited by 86
Software Quality: Analysis and Guidelines for Success
Jones, C. (2000) · Cited by 86
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Bevan, N. 1997. ISO 9126, EAGLES evaluation group workshop, Evaluation in Natural Language Engineering: Standards and Sharing, Brussels, November 26th and 27th, http://www.cst.ku.dk/projects/eagles2/workshop/ISOnigel.html.
- Gore, A. 1998. A letter from Vice President Al Gore, Common Ground 8(3): 1.
- ISO 9241. 1992/2001. Ergonomics Requirements for Office with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs), Geneva, International Organization for Standardization.
- ISO/IEC 9126. 2001. Software Product Evaluation-Quality Characteristics and Guidelines for the User, Geneva, International Organization for Standardization.
- Nielsen, J. 1994. Usability Engineering, Boston, Academic Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Empirical Studies on Usability of mHealth Apps: A Systematic Literature Review
Zapata, B. C., Fernández-Alemán, J. L., Idri, A., & Toval, A. (2015) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-014-0182-2 · Cited by 585
Review of health information technology usability study methodologies
Yen, P.-Y., & Bakken, S. (2012) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2010-000020 · Cited by 390
A survey of software learnability: metrics, methodologies and guidelines
Grossman, T., Fitzmaurice, G., & Attar, R. (2009) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1518701.1518803 · Cited by 322
“Indeed, there is a consistent agreement that learnability is an important component of usability [1, 10, 33, 40], with some arguing that it is the most fundamental usability attribute [33].”
BackgroundBrown, W., Yen, P.-Y., Rojas, M., & Schnall, R. (2013) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2013.08.001 · Cited by 299
“[19 ] Usability of a technology is determined by user-computer interactions and the degree to which the technology can be successfully integrated to perform a task in the intended work environment.”
BackgroundA method to standardize usability metrics into a single score
Sauro, J., & Kindlund, E. (2005) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1054972.1055028 · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Abran, A., Khelifi, A., Suryn, W., & Seffah, A.
- Affiliations
- École de Technologie Supérieure (CA)
- Concordia University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Abran, Alain
- Khelifi, Adel
- Suryn, Witold
- Seffah, Ahmed
- Venue
- Software Quality Journal
- Published
- 2003-11
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 325-338
- ISSN
- 0963-9314 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1367
- OpenAlex
- W1537911176
- Cited by
- 451
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 22
- FWCI
- 7.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Software Quality Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
- Keywords
- software usability, ISO standards, usability evaluation, usability model, software quality, normative model, usability measurement, software engineering practices
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
