CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 320Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 89 of the 92 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 3 are not checked yet.

Gender Differences in Delay of Gratification: A Meta-Analysis

Silverman, Irwin W.·2003·Sex Roles
DOI 10.1023/a:1025872421115
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1025872421115

Cites

89 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 92 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Anderson, W. H., Jr. (1974). Self-control as used in a delay of gratification paradigm with children. Unpublished dissertation, State University of New York at Stony Brook.
  2. Drucker, L. (1982). The effects of age, cognitive strategy, type of controlling speech and reward preference in delay of gratification. Unpublished dissertation, Hofstra University,Hempstead, NY.
  3. Ferrarese, M. J. (1981). Reflectiveness-impulsivity and competence in children under stress. Unpublished dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
  4. Kelman, S. M. (1972). Locus of control and delay of gratification. Unpublished dissertation, Boston University, Boston, MA.
  5. McGavin, J. T., III. (1979). The effects of task persistence, an imposed goal, self-monitoring, and reward preference on the ability to delay gratification. Unpublished dissertation, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.
  6. Randolph-Johnson, B. (1977). The utilization of verbal self-instructions as self-controlling responses in a delay of gratification paradigm. Unpublished dissertation, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS.
  7. Shipman, V. C. (1972). Disadvantaged children and their first school experience (Technical Rep. No. 12). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
  8. Vellenkoop, R. (1981). Self-control in delay of gratification: The effects of a goal contingency and response feedback in delay time and active work. Unpublished dissertation, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 320

Related

Metadata

Authors
Silverman, I. W.
Affiliations
Bowling Green State University (US)
Corresponding author
Silverman, Irwin W.
ORCID
Silverman, Irwin W.
Venue
Sex Roles
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2003-11
Volume
49
Issue
9-10
Pages
451-463
ISSN
  • 0360-0025 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2762
DOI
10.1023/a:1025872421115
OpenAlex
W2293944057
Cited by
303
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 16
FWCI
0.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Sex Roles (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
delay of gratification, gender differences, delayed rewards, immediate versus delayed rewards, female advantage, evolutionary selection pressure, age differences, sex differences in behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review