Cited by 36Agriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentLand Rights and ReformsExtractivism and Socioeconomic Issues

The changing dynamics of land conflict in the Brazilian Amazon: The rural-urban complex and its environmental implications

Simmons, Cynthia S., Perz, Stephen, Pedlowski, Marcos A., Silva, Luiz Guilherme Teixeira·2002·Urban Ecosystems

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1025918730400

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simmons, C. S., Perz, S., Pedlowski, M. A., & Silva, L. G. T.
Affiliations
  • Central Michigan University (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
  • State University of Norte Fluminense (BR)
Venue
Urban Ecosystems
Published
2002-03
Volume
6
Issue
1-2
Pages
99-121
ISSN
  • 1083-8155 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1642
OpenAlex
W1537270491
Cited by
36
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Urban Ecosystems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Land Rights and Reforms
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Extractivism and Socioeconomic Issues
Keywords
land disputes, Brazilian Amazon, agrarian conflict, urbanization, urban-rural relations, deforestation, land cover change, agricultural frontier, environmental degradation, social instability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review