Cited by 28Climate change impacts on agricultureClimate variability and modelsClimate Change Policy and Economics

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Spatial Scale Effects of Climate Scenarios on Simulated Cotton Production in the Southeastern U.S.A.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1026030400826

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Adams, R. M., McCarl, B. A., and Mearns, L. O.: 2003, 'The Effects of Spatial Scale of Climate Scenarios on Economic Assessments: An Example from U.S. Agriculture', Clim. Change 60, 131–148. · DOI
  2. Albers, D. W., Mobley, J., and Tracy, P. W.: 1992, 'Evaluation of GOSSYM-COMAX in Missouri 1987-1991', in Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf. National Cotton Council, Memphis, Tennessee, U.S.A., pp. 1350–1351.
  3. Baker, D. N. and Landivar, J. A.: 1991, 'The Simulation of Plant Development in GOSSYM', in Hodges, T. (ed.), Predicting Crop Phenology, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 153–170.
  4. Boone, M. Y. L., Porter, D. O., and McKinion, J. M.: 1993, 'Calibration of GOSSYM: Theory and Practice', Comput. Electron. Agric. 9, 193–203. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Brown, R. A. and Rosenberg, N. J.: 1999, 'Climate Change Impacts on the Potential Productivity of Corn and Winter Wheat in their Primary United States Growing Regions', Clim. Change 41, 73–107. · DOI
  6. Carbone, G, Kiechle, W., Locke, C., Mearns, L. O., McDaniel, L., and Downton, M.: 2003, 'Response of Soybeans and Sorghum to Varying Spatial Scales of Climate Change Scenarios in the Southeastern United States', Clim. Change 60, 73–98. · DOI
  7. Dudek, D. J.: 1989, 'Climate Change Impacts upon Agriculture and Resources: A Case Study of California', in Smith, J. and Tirpak, D. (eds.), The Potential Effects of Global Climate Change on the United States, Appendix C: Agriculture, Vol. 1, EPA-230-05-89-053.
  8. Dugas, W. A., Heuer, M. L., Hunsaker, D., Kimball, B. A., Lewin, K. F., Nagy, J., and Johnson, M.: 1994, 'Sap Flow Measurements of Transpiration from Cotton Grown under Ambient and Enriched CO2 Concentrations', Agric. For. Meteorol. 70, 231–246. · DOI
  9. Easterling, W., Chhetri, N., and Niu, X.: 2003, 'Improving the Realism of Modeling Agronomic Adaptation to Climatic Change: Simulating Technological Substitution', Clim. Change 60, 149–173. · DOI
  10. Felzer, B. and Heard, P.: 1999, 'Precipitation Differences amongst GCMs Used for the U. S. National Assessment', J. of the American Water Resources Association 35, 1327–1339. · DOI
  11. Giorgi, F., Hewittson, B., Christensen. J., Hulme, M., Von Storch, H., Whetton, P., Jones, R., Mearns, L., and Fu, C.: 2001, 'Regional Climate Information-Evaluation and Projections', in Houghton, J. T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D. J., Noguer, M., van der Linden, P. J., Dai, X., Maskell, K., and Johnson, C. A. (eds.), Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis, Chapter 10, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., pp. 583–638.
  12. Giorgi, F., Marinucci, M. R., and Bates, G. T.: 1993, 'Development of a Second Generation Regional Climate Model (RegCM2): Boundary Layer and Radiative Transfer Processes', Mon. Wea. Rev. 121, 2794–2813. · DOI
  13. Giorgi, F., Mearns, L. O., Shields, C., and McDaniel, L.: 1998, 'Regional Nested Model Simulations of Present Day and 2 × CO2 Climate over the Central Plains of the U.S.', Clim. Change 40, 457–493. · DOI
  14. Gitay, H., Brown, S., Easterling, W., and Jallow, B.: 2001, 'Ecosystems and their Goods and Services', in McCarthy, J. J., Canziani, O. F., Leary, N. A., Dokken, D. J., and White, K. S. (eds.), Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, Chapter 5, pp. 234–342.
  15. Hearn, A. B.: 1994, 'OZCOT: A Simulation Model for Cotton Crop Management', Agric. Sys. 44, 257–259. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Hodges, H. F., Whisler, F. D., Bridges, S. M., Reddy, K. R., and McKinion, J. M.: 1998, 'Simulation in Crop Management: GOSSYM/COMAX', in Peart R. M. and Curry, A. B. (eds.), Agricultural Systems Modeling and Simulation, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, U.S.A., pp. 235–281.
  17. Hunsaker, D. J., Hendrey, G. R., Kimball, B.A., Lewin, K. F., Mauney, J. R., and Nagy, J.: 1994, 'Cotton Evapotranspiration under Field Conditions with CO2 Enrichment and Variable Soil Moisture Regimes', Agric. For. Meteorol. 70, 247–258. · DOI
  18. Jackson, B. S., Arkin, G. F., and Hearn, A. B.: 1998, 'The Cotton Simulation Model “COTTAM”: Fruiting Model Calibration and Testing', Transactions of the ASAE 31, 846–854. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Kimball, B. A., LaMorte, R. L., Seay, R. S., Pinter, P. J. Jr., Rokey, R. R., Hunsaker, D. J., Dugas, W. A., Heuer, M. L., Mauney, J. R., Hendrey, G. R., Lewin, K. F., and Nagy, J.: 1994, 'Effects of Free-Air CO2 Enrichment on Energy Balance and Evapotranspiration of Cotton', Agric. For. Meteorol. 70, 259–278. · DOI
  20. Kimball, B. A. and Mauney, J. R.: 1993, 'Response of Cotton to Varying CO2, Irrigation, and Nitrogen: Yyield and Growth', Agron. J. 85, 706–712. · DOI
  21. Mearns, L. O., Carbone, G., Doherty, R. M., Tsvetsinskaya, E. A., McCarl, B. A., Adams, R. M., and McDaniel, L.: 2003a, The Uncertainty Due to Spatial Scale of Climate Scenarios in Integrated Assessments: An Example from U.S. Agriculture, Integrated Assessment, accepted. · DOI
  22. Mearns, L. O., Carbone, G., Gao, W., McDaniel, L., Tsvetsinskaya, E., McCarl, B., and Adams, R.: 2000, 'The Issue of Spatial Scale in Integrated Assessments: An Example of Agriculture in the Southeastern U.S.', in Preprints of the 80th AMS Annual Meeting, 11th Symposium on Global Change Studies, January 9-14, 2000, Long Beach, CA, American Meteorological Society, Boston, pp. 38–41.
  23. Mearns, L. O., Easterling, W., and Hays, C.: 2001, 'Comparison of Agricultural Impacts of Climate Change Calculated from High and Low Resolution Climate Model Scenarios: Part I: The Uncertainty Due to Spatial Scale', Clim. Change 51, 131–172. · DOI
  24. Mearns, L. O., Giorgi, F., McDaniel, L., and Shields, C.: 2003b, 'Climate Scenarios for the Southeastern U.S. Based on GCM and Regional Model Simulations', Clim. Change 60, 7–35. · DOI
  25. Mearns L. O, Hulme, M., Carter, T. R., Leemans, R., Lal, M., and Whetton, P.: 2001, 'Climate Scenario Development', in Houghton, J. T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D. J., Noguer, M., van der Linden, P. J., Dai, X., Maskell, K., and Johnson, C. A. (eds.), Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis, Chapter 13, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., pp. 739–768.
  26. Mearns, L. O., Mavromatis, T., Tsvetsinskaya, E., Hays, C., and Easterling, W.: 1999, 'Comparative Response of EPIC and CERES Crop Models to High and Low Resolution Climate Change Scenarios', J. Geophys. Res. 104, 6623–6646. · DOI
  27. Pinter, P. J. Jr., Kimball, B. A., Garcia, R. L., Wall, G. W., Hunsaker, D. J., and LaMorte, R. L.: 1996, 'Free-Air CO2 Enrichment: Responses of Cotton and Wheat Crops', in Koch, G. W. and Mooney, H. A. (eds.), Carbon Dioxide and Terrestrial Ecosystems, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 215–249. · DOI
  28. Plant, R. E.: 1989, 'An Integrated Decision Support System for Agricultural Management', Agric. Sys. 29, 49–66. · DOI
  29. Reddy, K. R., Boone, M. Y. L., Reddy, V. R., Hodges, H. F., Turner, S., and McKinion, J. M.: 1995, 'Developing and Validating a Model for a Plant Growth Regulator', Agron. J. 87, 1100–1105. · DOI
  30. Reddy, K. R. and Boone, M. Y. L.: 2001, 'Modeling and Validating Cotton Leaf Area Development and Stem Elongation', Acta Horticulturae 593, 193–199.
  31. Reddy, K. R., Doma, P. R., Mearns, L. O., Bonne, M. Y. L., Hodges, H. F., Richardson, A. G., and Kakani, V. G.: 2002, 'Simulating the Impacts of Climate Change on Cotton Production in the Mississippi Delta', Clim. Res. 22, 271–281. · DOI
  32. Reddy, K. R., Hodges, H. F., and Kimball, B. A.: 2000, 'Crop Ecosystem Responses to Global Climate Change: Cotton', in Reddy, K. R. and Hodges, H. F. (eds.), Climate Change and Global Crop Productivity, Chapter 8, CAB International, U.K., pp. 161–187. · DOI
  33. Reddy, K. R., Hodges, H. F., and McKinion, J. M.: 1997a, 'Crop Modeling and Applications: A Cotton Example', in Sparks, D. L. (ed.), Advances in Agronomy, Vol. 59, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 225–290.
  34. Reddy, K. R., Hodges, H. F., and McKinion, J. M.: 1997b, 'Modeling Temperature Effects on Cotton Internode and Leaf Growth', Crop Science 37, 503–509. · DOI
  35. Reddy, K. R., Hodges, H. F., and McKinion, J. M.: 1997c, 'A Comparison of Scenarios for the Effect of Global Climate Change on Cotton Growth and Yield', Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 24, 707–713.
  36. Reddy, V. R., Baker, D. N., and Jenkins, J. N.: 1985, 'Validation of GOSSYM: Part II-Mississippi Conditions', Agric. Sys. 17, 133–154. · DOI
  37. Reilly, J. M. and U.S. National Assessment Agriculture Sector Team: 2001, Agriculture: The Potential Consequences of Climate Variability and Change for the United States, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 136 pp.
  38. Staggenborg, S. A., Lascano, R. J., and Krieg, D. R.: 1996, 'Determining Cotton Water Use in a Semiarid Climate with the GOSSYM Cotton Simulation Model', Agron. J. 88, 127–132. · DOI
  39. Tsvetsinskaya, E., Mearns, L. O., Mavromatis, T., Gao, W., McDaniel, L., and Downton, M.: 2003, 'The Effect of Spatial Scale of Climatic Change Scenarios on the SimulatedMaize,WinterWheat and Rice Production in the Southeastern United States', Clim. Change 60, 37–71. · DOI
  40. Wall, G.W., Amthor, J. S., and Kimball, B. A.: 1994, 'COTCO2: A Cotton Growth SimulationModel for Global Change', Agric. For. Meteorol. 70, 289–342. · DOI · Paper page
  41. Watterson, I. G., O'Farrell, S. P., and Dix, M. R.: 1997, 'Energy and Water Transport in Climates Simulated by a General Circulation Model that Includes Dynamical Sea-Ice', J. Geophy. Res. 102, 11027–11037. · DOI
  42. Zeng, W. and Heilman, J. L.: 1997, 'Sensitivity of Evapotranspiration of Cotton and Sorghum in West Texas to Changes in Climate and CO2', Theor. Appl. Climatol. 57, 245–254. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Doherty, R. M., Mearns, L. O., Reddy, K. R., Downton, M. W., & McDaniel, L.
Affiliations
  • NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US)
  • Mississippi State University (US)
Corresponding author
Doherty, Ruth M.
Venue
Climatic Change
Published
2003-09
Volume
60
Issue
1-2
Pages
99-129
ISSN
  • 0165-0009 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1480
OpenAlex
W4251458200
Cited by
28
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Climatic Change (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
  • Mississippi State University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Climate change impacts on agriculture
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
Keywords
cotton yield, climate change scenarios, global climate models, regional climate model, elevated CO2, climate change adaptation, irrigation, rainfed agriculture, water stress, southeastern United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review