The Caregiver Quality of Life Index–Cancer (CQOLC) scale: development and validation of an instrument to measure quality of life of the family caregiver of patients with cancer
Abstract
Family caregivers have become increasingly responsible for providing home care for cancer patients. Research has documented the distress of family caregivers; however, little has been done to evaluate the broader impact of caregiving on quality of life (QoL). The objectives of this study were to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Caregiver Quality of Life Index-Cancer (CQOLC), a new self-report instrument. Two hundred and sixty-three family caregivers of patients with lung, breast or prostate neoplasms participated. Test-retest reliability was 0.95 and internal consistency was 0.91. As expected, there were moderate correlations with overall mental health (r = 0.64), emotional distress (r = -0.50 to -0.52), burden (r = -0.65) and patient's performance status (r = -0.47) and low correlations with overall physical health (r = 0.13), social support (r = 0.22) and social desirability (r = 0.08). These results show that increased overall mental health is associated with better QoL, while more emotional distress and worsening patient performance status are associated with poorer QoL. Thus, the CQOLC appears to possess adequate validity, test-retest reliability and internal consistency. Future directions include further evaluation of sensitivity to change and factor analysis to determine the principal health-related QoL domains evaluated by the CQOLC.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Caregiver Quality of Life-Cancer scale is a reliable and valid 35-item measure of quality of life in cancer caregivers.
“The Caregiver Quality of Life – Cancer scale is a reliable and valid 35-item measure of quality of life in cancer caregivers (Weitzner et al. 1999; Edwards & Ung, 2002).”
From Utilizing a Manualized Therapy to Provide Parallel Treatment to Older Adults With Cancer and Their Caregivers: A Case Study (2022) · cites this paper as Weitzner et al. 1999
Melissa's four-point quality-of-life change is well below the published standard deviations of 16.3 to 24.7 for the Caregiver Quality of Life-Cancer scale.
“the four-point change she reported is well below published standard deviations for the scale that range from 16.3 to 24.7 (Weitzner, Jacobsen, Wagner, Friedland, & Cox, 1999).”
From Utilizing a Manualized Therapy to Provide Parallel Treatment to Older Adults With Cancer and Their Caregivers: A Case Study (2022) · cites this paper as Weitzner, Jacobsen, Wagner, Friedland, & Cox, 1999
Otras publicaciones reportan características similares en términos de sexo, relación con el paciente, ingresos económicos bajos (menores a USD 500) y un alto grado de compromiso del cuidador manifestado por el número de horas al día dedicadas a su atención.
“Otras publicaciones reportan características similares en términos de sexo, relación con el paciente, ingresos económicos bajos (menores a USD 500) (42-44) y un alto grado de compromiso del cuidador por atender a su familiar enfermo, manifestado por el número de horas al día dedicadas a su atención (45, 46).”
From Factores relacionados con sobrecarga del cuidador informal de pacientes con cáncer avanzado (2024) · cites this paper as [44]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 58 · Cited by 481
- Authors
- Weitzner, M. A., Jacobsen, P. B., Wagner, H., Friedland, J., & Cox, C.
- Affiliations
- Moffitt Cancer Center (US)
- Venue
- Quality of Life Research
- Published
- 1999-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 55-63
- ISSN
- 0962-9343 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2649
- OpenAlex
- W1994281331
- Cited by
- 481
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 1.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Quality of Life Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
- Keywords
- family caregivers, caregiver quality of life, cancer, home care, emotional distress, caregiver burden, mental health, performance status, lung cancer, breast cancer, prostate cancer, self-report measures, psychometric validation
- MeSH terms
- Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Family, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sensitivity and Specificity, Social Support, Stress, Psychological, Reproducibility of Results, Caregivers, Cost of Illness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review