Cited by 1,806Image Retrieval and Classification TechniquesComputer Graphics and Visualization TechniquesImage and Signal Denoising Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.

A Parametric Texture Model Based on Joint Statistics of Complex Wavelet Coefficients

Portilla, Javier, Simoncelli, Eero P.·2000·International Journal of Computer Vision

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1026553619983

Cites

68 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 68 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Bergen, J.R. and Landy, M.S. 1991. “Computational modeling of visual texture segregation: Computational models of visual processing. M.S. Landy and J.A. Morshon (Eds.). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 253–271.
  2. Bovik, A.C., Clark, M., and Geisler, W.S. 1992. Localized measurements of emergent image frequencies by Gabor wavelets. IEEE Pat. Anal. Mach. Intell., 38:691–712.
  3. Knutsson, H. and Granlund, G.H. 1983. Texture analysis using twodimensional quadrature filters. In Workshop on Computer Architecture for Pattern Analysis and Image Database Management, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 206–213.
  4. Portilla, J. and Simoncelli, E. 1999. Texture modeling and synthesis using joint statistics of complex wavelet coefficients. In IEEE Workshop on Statistical and Computational Theories of Vision, Fort Collins, CO. Available at http://www.cis.ohiostate.edu/~szhu/SCTV99.html.
  5. Portilla, J. and Simoncelli, E. 2000. Image denoising via adjustment ofwavelet coefficient magnitude correlation. In Seventh IEEE Int'l Conf. on Image Proc., Vancouver, September 10– 13. IEEE Computer Society.
  6. Zetzsche, C., Wegmann, B., and Bart, E. 1993. Nonlinear aspects of primary vision: Entropy reduction beyond decorrelation. In Int'l Symposium, Society for Information Display, Vol. XXIV, pp. 933–936.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,806

Metadata

Authors
Portilla, J., & Simoncelli, E. P.
Affiliations
Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences (US)
Corresponding author
Portilla, Javier
Venue
International Journal of Computer Vision
Published
2000-10
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
49-70
ISSN
  • 0920-5691 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1405
OpenAlex
W2127006916
Cited by
1,806
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 75 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 81 · 2021: 92 · 2020: 91 · 2019: 94 · 2018: 101 · 2017: 101 · 2016: 100 · 2015: 86 · 2014: 83 · 2013: 70 · 2012: 61
FWCI
39.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Computer Vision (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Signal Denoising Methods
Keywords
texture modeling, texture synthesis, complex wavelet transform, projection onto convex sets, natural textures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review