Cited by 157Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyDysphagia Assessment and ManagementNutrition and Health in Aging

Enteral long-term nutrition via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in 210 patients a four-year prospective study

Loser, Chr., Wolters, S., Folsch, U. R.·1998·Digestive Diseases and Sciences

Abstract

After PEG placement at the Medical Department of the University Hospital in Kiel, 210 patients (mean age 61.3 years; 137 men, 73 women) were prospectively followed-up for 133+/-181 days. Close-meshed evaluations of the development of nutritional status, long-term outcome, complications, subjective acceptability, patient care after discharge from the hospital, survival, and nutritional long-term problems were performed. The PEG procedure (duration 13.3+/-4.2 min) was carried out for neurological (42%), ear-nose-throat (28%), and internal medical (30%) indications. Procedure-related mortality was 0%, while altogether 3.8% severe and 20.0% mild complications were observed. Body weight decreased by a mean of 11.4+/-1.5 kg in the three months before and increased by 3.5+/-1.7 kg one year after PEG placement with no significant differences between malignant or benign underlying diseases. Individual subjective acceptability was excellent in 83%, sufficient in 15%, and poor in 2% of patients only. One-year survival rate was 34.3%. The various results of the present prospective study demonstrate that long-term enteral feeding via PEG is a safe, effective, easy-to-practice, and highly acceptable method with excellent long-term results and distinct improvement of nutritional status. Individual decisions for PEG placement should be considered much earlier and more frequently in appropriate patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1026615106348

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Enteral nutrition is frequently commenced late after substantial weight loss has already developed, which is in the stage of severe malnutrition and hampers effective nutritional therapy.

    “EN is frequently commenced late after substantial weight loss has already developed, which is in the stage of severe malnutrition (128, 129) and which hampers effective nutritional therapy (130).”
  • Some studies show that a substantial weight loss has frequently occurred before the initiation of EN, i.e. on average 11.4 kg in the study by Loser et al.

    “Some studies show that a substantial weight loss has frequently occurred before the initiation of EN, i.e. on average 11.4 kg in the study byLoser et al. (128, 136).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Loser, C., Wolters, S., & Folsch, U. R.
Venue
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Published
1998-11
Volume
43
Issue
11
Pages
2549-2557
ISSN
  • 0163-2116 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2568
OpenAlex
W1471276
Cited by
157
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Digestive Diseases and Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Dysphagia Assessment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
Keywords
percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, long-term enteral nutrition, nutritional status, PEG complications, patient acceptability, survival, weight change, neurological disorders, internal medicine patients
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Enteral Nutrition, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Gastroscopy, Gastrostomy, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Time Factors, Body Mass Index, Survival Rate, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review