Cited by 440Deception detection and forensic psychologyMisinformation and Its ImpactsAuthorship Attribution and Profiling

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Automating Linguistics-Based Cues for Detecting Deception in Text-Based Asynchronous Computer-Mediated Communications

Zhou, Lina, Burgoon, Judee K., Nunamaker, Jay F., Twitchell, Doug·2004·Group Decision and Negotiation

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:grup.0000011944.62889.6f

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. Aggarwal, C. C. and P. S. Yu. (2001). “Outlier Detection for High Dimensional Data,” Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD, Santa Barbara, California, 37-46. · DOI
  2. Akehurst, L., G. Köhnken, and E. Höfer. (1995). “The Analysis and Application of Statement Validity Assessment,” Proceedings of the Fifth European Conference on Psychology and Law, Budapest, Hungary.
  3. Buller, D. B. and J. K. Burgoon. (1994). “Deception: Strategic and Nonstrategic Communication,” in J. A. Daly, and J. M. Wiemann (eds.), Strategic Interpersonal Communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 191–223.
  4. Buller, D. B. and J. K. Burgoon. (1996). “Interpersonal Deception Theory,” Communication Theory 6, 203–242. · DOI
  5. Buller, D. B., J. K. Burgoon, A. Buslig, and J. Roiger. (1994). “Interpersonal Deception: VIII. Nonverbal and Verbal Correlates of Equivocation from the Bavelas et al. (1990) Research,” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 13, 396–417. · DOI
  6. Buller, D. B., J. K. Burgoon, A. Buslig, and J. Roiger. (1996). “Testing Interpersonal Deception Theory: The Language of Interpersonal Deception,” Communication Theory 6, 268–289. · DOI
  7. Burgoon, J. K., D. E. Buller, L. K. Guerrero, W. A. Afifi, and C. M. Feldman. (1996). “Interpersonal Deception: XII. Information Management Dimensions Underlying Deceptive and Truthful Messages,” Communication Monographs 63, 52–69. · DOI
  8. Burgoon, J. K., M. Burgoon, and M. Wilkinson. (1981). “Writing Style as Predictor of Newspaper Readership, Satisfaction and Image,” Journalism Quarterly 58, 225–231. · DOI
  9. Chidambaram, L. (1996). “Relational Development in Computer-Supported Groups,” MIS Quarterly 20, 143–165. · DOI
  10. Crystal, D. (1969). Prosodic Systems and Intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Crystal, D. (2001). Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · DOI
  12. DePaulo, B. M., J. T. Stone, and G. D. Lassiter. (1985). “Deceiving and Detecting Deceit,” in B. R. Schlenker (ed.), The Self and Social Life. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  13. Donohue, W. A. (1991). “Verbal Intensity: Communication, Marital Dispute, and Divorce Mediation,” Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  14. Driscoll, L. N. (1994). “A Validity Assessment of Written Statements from Suspects in Criminal Investigations Using the Scan Technique,” Police Studies 17, 77–88.
  15. Ekman, P. (1985). Telling Lies. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
  16. Fawcett, T. and F. Provost. (1997). “Adaptive Fraud Detection,” Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Journal 1, 291–316. · DOI
  17. Frank, M. G. and T. H. Feeley. (in press). “To Catch a Liar: Challenges for Research in Lie Detection Training,” Journal of Applied Communication Research.
  18. Hernandez-Fernaud, E. and M. Alonso-Quecuty. (1997). “The Cognitive Interview and Lie Detection: A New Magnifying Glass for Sherlock Holmes?” Applied Cognitive Psychology 11, 55–68. · DOI
  19. Höfer, E., L. Akehurst, and G. Metzger. (1996). “Reality Monitoring: A Chance for Further Development of CBCA?” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the European Association on Psychology and Law, Sienna, Italy.
  20. Jarvenpaa, S. L. and D. E. Leidner. (1998). “Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Terms,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 3. · DOI
  21. Johnson, M. K. (1988). “Reality Monitoring: An Experimental Phenomenological Approach,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 117, 390–394. · DOI
  22. Johnson, M. K., M. A. Foley, A. G. Suengas, and C. L. Raye. (1988). “Phenomenal Characteristics of Memories for Perceived and Imagined Autobiographical Events,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 117, 371–376. · DOI
  23. Johnson, M. K. and C. L. Raye. (1981). “Reality Monitoring,” Psychological Review 88, 67–85. · DOI
  24. Karlsson, F. and L. Karttunen. (1997). “Sub-Sentential Processing,” in R. Cole, J. Mariani, H. Uszkoreit, A. Zaenen, and V. Zue (eds.), Survey of the State of the Art in Human Language Technology, Pisa, Italy: Cambridge University Press.
  25. Köhnken, G., E. Schimossek, E. Aschermann, and E. Höfer. (1995). “The Cognitive Interview and the Assessment of the Credibility of Adults' Statements,” Journal of Applied Psychology 80, 671–684. · DOI
  26. Kraut, R. E. (1978). “Verbal and Nonverbal Cues in the Perception of Lying,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36, 380–391. · DOI
  27. Lafferty, J. and P. Eady. (1974). The Desert Survival Problem. Plymouth, Michigan: Experimental Learning Methods.
  28. Landry, K. and J. C. Brigham. (1992). “The Effect of Training in Criteria-Based Content Analysis on the Ability to Detect Deception in Adults,” Law and Human Behavior 16, 663–675. · DOI
  29. Lindsay, D. S. and M. K. Johnson. (1987). “Reality Monitoring and Suggestibility: Children's Ability to Discriminate Among Memories from Different Sources,” in S. J. Ceci, J. Toglia, and D. F. Ross (eds.), Children's Eyewitness Memory. New York: Springer-Verlag, 91–121.
  30. Mehrabian, A. and M. Wiener. (1966). “Nonimmediacy Between Communicator and Object of Communication in a Verbal Message: Application to the Inference of Attitudes,” Journal of Consulting Psychology 30, 420–425. · DOI
  31. Mukherjee, B., L. T. Heberlein, and K. N. Levitt. (1994). “Network Intrusion Detection,” IEEE Network 8, 26–41. · DOI
  32. Porter, S. and J. C. Yuille. (1996). “The Language of Deceit: An Investigation of the Verbal Clues to Deception in the Interrogation Context,” Law and Human Behavior 20, 443–458. · DOI
  33. Raskin, D. C. and P. W. Esplin. (1991). “Statement Validity Assessment: Interview Procedures and Content Analysis of Children's Statements of Sexual Abuse,” Behavioral Assessment 13, 265–291.
  34. Ruby, C. L. and J. C. Brigham. (1997). “The Usefulness of the Criteria-Based Content Analysis Technique in Distinguishing Between Truthful and Fabricated Allegations,” Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 3, 705–737. · DOI
  35. Ruby, C. L. and J. C. Brigham. (1998). “Can Criteria-Based Content Analysis Distinguish Between True and False Statements of African-American Speakers?” Law and Human Behavior 22, 369–388. · DOI
  36. Samuelsson, C. and A. Voutilainen. (1997). “Comparing a Linguistic and a Stochastic Tagger,” Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 8th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Madrid, Spain, 246-253. · DOI
  37. Sapir, A. (1987). “The LSI Course on Scientific Content Analysis (SCAN),” Laboratory For Scientific Interrogation, Phoenix, AZ.
  38. Smith, N. (2001). “Reading Between the Lines: An Evaluation of the Scientific Content Analysis Technique (SCAN),” in C. F. Willis (ed.), Policing and Reducing Crime Unit: Police Research Series, London: Crown.
  39. Sporer, S. L. (1997). “The Less Travelled Road to Truth: Verbal Cues in Deception Detection in Accounts of Fabricated and Self-Experienced Events,” Applied Cognitive Psychology 11, 373–397. · DOI
  40. Steller, M. and G. Köhnken. (1989). “Criteria-Based Content Analysis,” in D. C. Raskin (ed.), Psychological Methods in Criminal Investigation and Evidence. New York: Springer Verlag, 217–245.
  41. Undeutsch, U. (1989). “The Development of Statement Reality Analysis,” in U. Undeutsch (ed.), Psychological Methods in Criminal Investigation and Evidence. The Netherlands: Kluwer, Dordrecht, 101–121.
  42. Voutilainen, A. (2000). “Helsinki Taggers and Parsers for English,” in J. M. Kirk (ed.), Corpora Galore: Analysis and Techniques in Describing English. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi.
  43. Vrij, A. (2000). Detecting Lies and Deceit: The Psychology of Lying and the Implications for Professional Practice. Chichester, England, New York: John Wiley Inc.
  44. Vrij, A., W. Kneller, and S. Mann. (2000). “The Effect of Informing Liars about Criteria-Based Content Analysis on their Ability to Deceive CBCA-Raters,” Legal and Criminological Psychology 5, 57–70. · DOI
  45. Wheeler, R. and S. Aitken. (2000). “Multiple Algorithms for Fraud Detection,” Knowledge-Based Systems 13, 93–99. · DOI
  46. Wiener, M. and A. Mehrabian. (1968). “Language Within Language: Immediacy, A Channel in Verbal Communication,” New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  47. Wolz, U., H. Walker, J. Palme, P. Anderson, Z. Chen, J. Dunne, G. Karlsson, A. Laribi, S. Mannikko, and R. Spielvogel. (1997). “Computer-Mediated Communication in Collaborative Educational Settings,” ACM SIGCUE Outlook 25, 51–68. · DOI
  48. Zhou, L., Q. E. Booker, and D. Zhang. (2002). “ROD-Toward Rapid Ontology Development for Underdeveloped Domains,” Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, Hawaii, Jan. 7-10.
  49. Zuckerman, M., B. M. DePaulo, and R. Rosenthal. (1981). “Verbal and Nonverbal Communication of Deception,” in L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. New York: Academic Press, 1–59.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zhou, L., Burgoon, J. K., Nunamaker, J. F., & Twitchell, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore County (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Venue
Group Decision and Negotiation
Published
2004-01
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
81-106
ISSN
  • 0926-2644 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9907
OpenAlex
W2035896792
Cited by
440
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 25
FWCI
14.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Group Decision and Negotiation (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense
  • U.S. Air Force
  • Air Force Office of Scientific Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Authorship Attribution and Profiling
Keywords
deception detection, linguistic cues, text analysis, uncertainty, informality, affect, text complexity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review