The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Automating Linguistics-Based Cues for Detecting Deception in Text-Based Asynchronous Computer-Mediated Communications
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Deception-conveying features can sometimes include wordy replies with low information and more expressions of uncertainty.
“For example, deception-conveying features can sometimes include wordy replies with low information (e.g., Pollina et al., 2017; Vendemia et al., 2005) and more expressions of uncertainty (Zhou et al., 2004).”
From Sorting Insiders From Co-Workers: Remote Synchronous Computer-Mediated Triage for Investigating Insider Attacks (2024) · cites this paper as Zhou et al., 2004
InSort is interactive, demanding higher levels of cognitive engagement.
“Thus, InSort is interactive (e.g., Lee et al., 2009; Sánchez-Junquera et al., 2020; Zhou et al., 2004), demanding higher levels of cognitive engagement (Burgoon et al., 2010).”
From Sorting Insiders From Co-Workers: Remote Synchronous Computer-Mediated Triage for Investigating Insider Attacks (2024) · cites this paper as Zhou et al., 2004
Citations
Cites
DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74 · Cited by 2,479
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 49
- Aggarwal, C. C. and P. S. Yu. (2001). “Outlier Detection for High Dimensional Data,” Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD, Santa Barbara, California, 37-46. · DOI
- Akehurst, L., G. Köhnken, and E. Höfer. (1995). “The Analysis and Application of Statement Validity Assessment,” Proceedings of the Fifth European Conference on Psychology and Law, Budapest, Hungary.
- Buller, D. B. and J. K. Burgoon. (1994). “Deception: Strategic and Nonstrategic Communication,” in J. A. Daly, and J. M. Wiemann (eds.), Strategic Interpersonal Communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 191–223.
- Buller, D. B. and J. K. Burgoon. (1996). “Interpersonal Deception Theory,” Communication Theory 6, 203–242. · DOI
- Buller, D. B., J. K. Burgoon, A. Buslig, and J. Roiger. (1994). “Interpersonal Deception: VIII. Nonverbal and Verbal Correlates of Equivocation from the Bavelas et al. (1990) Research,” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 13, 396–417. · DOI
- Buller, D. B., J. K. Burgoon, A. Buslig, and J. Roiger. (1996). “Testing Interpersonal Deception Theory: The Language of Interpersonal Deception,” Communication Theory 6, 268–289. · DOI
- Burgoon, J. K., D. E. Buller, L. K. Guerrero, W. A. Afifi, and C. M. Feldman. (1996). “Interpersonal Deception: XII. Information Management Dimensions Underlying Deceptive and Truthful Messages,” Communication Monographs 63, 52–69. · DOI
- Burgoon, J. K., M. Burgoon, and M. Wilkinson. (1981). “Writing Style as Predictor of Newspaper Readership, Satisfaction and Image,” Journalism Quarterly 58, 225–231. · DOI
- Chidambaram, L. (1996). “Relational Development in Computer-Supported Groups,” MIS Quarterly 20, 143–165. · DOI
- Crystal, D. (1969). Prosodic Systems and Intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Crystal, D. (2001). Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · DOI
- DePaulo, B. M., J. T. Stone, and G. D. Lassiter. (1985). “Deceiving and Detecting Deceit,” in B. R. Schlenker (ed.), The Self and Social Life. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Donohue, W. A. (1991). “Verbal Intensity: Communication, Marital Dispute, and Divorce Mediation,” Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Driscoll, L. N. (1994). “A Validity Assessment of Written Statements from Suspects in Criminal Investigations Using the Scan Technique,” Police Studies 17, 77–88.
- Ekman, P. (1985). Telling Lies. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
- Fawcett, T. and F. Provost. (1997). “Adaptive Fraud Detection,” Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Journal 1, 291–316. · DOI
- Frank, M. G. and T. H. Feeley. (in press). “To Catch a Liar: Challenges for Research in Lie Detection Training,” Journal of Applied Communication Research.
- Hernandez-Fernaud, E. and M. Alonso-Quecuty. (1997). “The Cognitive Interview and Lie Detection: A New Magnifying Glass for Sherlock Holmes?” Applied Cognitive Psychology 11, 55–68. · DOI
- Höfer, E., L. Akehurst, and G. Metzger. (1996). “Reality Monitoring: A Chance for Further Development of CBCA?” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the European Association on Psychology and Law, Sienna, Italy.
- Jarvenpaa, S. L. and D. E. Leidner. (1998). “Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Terms,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 3. · DOI
- Johnson, M. K. (1988). “Reality Monitoring: An Experimental Phenomenological Approach,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 117, 390–394. · DOI
- Johnson, M. K., M. A. Foley, A. G. Suengas, and C. L. Raye. (1988). “Phenomenal Characteristics of Memories for Perceived and Imagined Autobiographical Events,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 117, 371–376. · DOI
- Johnson, M. K. and C. L. Raye. (1981). “Reality Monitoring,” Psychological Review 88, 67–85. · DOI
- Karlsson, F. and L. Karttunen. (1997). “Sub-Sentential Processing,” in R. Cole, J. Mariani, H. Uszkoreit, A. Zaenen, and V. Zue (eds.), Survey of the State of the Art in Human Language Technology, Pisa, Italy: Cambridge University Press.
- Köhnken, G., E. Schimossek, E. Aschermann, and E. Höfer. (1995). “The Cognitive Interview and the Assessment of the Credibility of Adults' Statements,” Journal of Applied Psychology 80, 671–684. · DOI
- Kraut, R. E. (1978). “Verbal and Nonverbal Cues in the Perception of Lying,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36, 380–391. · DOI
- Lafferty, J. and P. Eady. (1974). The Desert Survival Problem. Plymouth, Michigan: Experimental Learning Methods.
- Landry, K. and J. C. Brigham. (1992). “The Effect of Training in Criteria-Based Content Analysis on the Ability to Detect Deception in Adults,” Law and Human Behavior 16, 663–675. · DOI
- Lindsay, D. S. and M. K. Johnson. (1987). “Reality Monitoring and Suggestibility: Children's Ability to Discriminate Among Memories from Different Sources,” in S. J. Ceci, J. Toglia, and D. F. Ross (eds.), Children's Eyewitness Memory. New York: Springer-Verlag, 91–121.
- Mehrabian, A. and M. Wiener. (1966). “Nonimmediacy Between Communicator and Object of Communication in a Verbal Message: Application to the Inference of Attitudes,” Journal of Consulting Psychology 30, 420–425. · DOI
- Mukherjee, B., L. T. Heberlein, and K. N. Levitt. (1994). “Network Intrusion Detection,” IEEE Network 8, 26–41. · DOI
- Porter, S. and J. C. Yuille. (1996). “The Language of Deceit: An Investigation of the Verbal Clues to Deception in the Interrogation Context,” Law and Human Behavior 20, 443–458. · DOI
- Raskin, D. C. and P. W. Esplin. (1991). “Statement Validity Assessment: Interview Procedures and Content Analysis of Children's Statements of Sexual Abuse,” Behavioral Assessment 13, 265–291.
- Ruby, C. L. and J. C. Brigham. (1997). “The Usefulness of the Criteria-Based Content Analysis Technique in Distinguishing Between Truthful and Fabricated Allegations,” Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 3, 705–737. · DOI
- Ruby, C. L. and J. C. Brigham. (1998). “Can Criteria-Based Content Analysis Distinguish Between True and False Statements of African-American Speakers?” Law and Human Behavior 22, 369–388. · DOI
- Samuelsson, C. and A. Voutilainen. (1997). “Comparing a Linguistic and a Stochastic Tagger,” Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 8th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Madrid, Spain, 246-253. · DOI
- Sapir, A. (1987). “The LSI Course on Scientific Content Analysis (SCAN),” Laboratory For Scientific Interrogation, Phoenix, AZ.
- Smith, N. (2001). “Reading Between the Lines: An Evaluation of the Scientific Content Analysis Technique (SCAN),” in C. F. Willis (ed.), Policing and Reducing Crime Unit: Police Research Series, London: Crown.
- Sporer, S. L. (1997). “The Less Travelled Road to Truth: Verbal Cues in Deception Detection in Accounts of Fabricated and Self-Experienced Events,” Applied Cognitive Psychology 11, 373–397. · DOI
- Steller, M. and G. Köhnken. (1989). “Criteria-Based Content Analysis,” in D. C. Raskin (ed.), Psychological Methods in Criminal Investigation and Evidence. New York: Springer Verlag, 217–245.
- Undeutsch, U. (1989). “The Development of Statement Reality Analysis,” in U. Undeutsch (ed.), Psychological Methods in Criminal Investigation and Evidence. The Netherlands: Kluwer, Dordrecht, 101–121.
- Voutilainen, A. (2000). “Helsinki Taggers and Parsers for English,” in J. M. Kirk (ed.), Corpora Galore: Analysis and Techniques in Describing English. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi.
- Vrij, A. (2000). Detecting Lies and Deceit: The Psychology of Lying and the Implications for Professional Practice. Chichester, England, New York: John Wiley Inc.
- Vrij, A., W. Kneller, and S. Mann. (2000). “The Effect of Informing Liars about Criteria-Based Content Analysis on their Ability to Deceive CBCA-Raters,” Legal and Criminological Psychology 5, 57–70. · DOI
- Wheeler, R. and S. Aitken. (2000). “Multiple Algorithms for Fraud Detection,” Knowledge-Based Systems 13, 93–99. · DOI
- Wiener, M. and A. Mehrabian. (1968). “Language Within Language: Immediacy, A Channel in Verbal Communication,” New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
- Wolz, U., H. Walker, J. Palme, P. Anderson, Z. Chen, J. Dunne, G. Karlsson, A. Laribi, S. Mannikko, and R. Spielvogel. (1997). “Computer-Mediated Communication in Collaborative Educational Settings,” ACM SIGCUE Outlook 25, 51–68. · DOI
- Zhou, L., Q. E. Booker, and D. Zhang. (2002). “ROD-Toward Rapid Ontology Development for Underdeveloped Domains,” Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, Hawaii, Jan. 7-10.
- Zuckerman, M., B. M. DePaulo, and R. Rosenthal. (1981). “Verbal and Nonverbal Communication of Deception,” in L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. New York: Academic Press, 1–59.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods
Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x09351676 · Cited by 5,774
Combating Fake News: A Survey on Identification and Mitigation Techniques
Sharma, K., Qian, F., Jiang, H., Ruchansky, N., Zhang, M., & Liu, Y. (2019) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3305260 · Cited by 514
Lowry, P. B., Zhang, D., Zhou, L., & Fu, X. (2010) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2009.00334.x · Cited by 206
Self-citationUsing natural language processing to analyse text data in behavioural science
Feuerriegel, S., Maarouf, A., Bär, D., Geissler, D., Schweisthal, J., Pröllochs, N., Robertson, C. E., Rathje, S., Hartmann, J., Mohammad, S. M., et al. (2025) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-024-00392-z · Cited by 140
Ludwig, S., van Laer, T., de Ruyter, K., & Friedman, M. (2016) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2016.1205927 · Cited by 49
Vizer, L. M., & Sears, A. (2017) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.03.001 · Cited by 12
Dando, C. J., Taylor, P. J., Menacere, T., Ormerod, T. C., Ball, L. J., & Sandham, A. L. (2024) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/00187208211068292 · Cited by 10
“Thus, InSort is interactive (e.g., Lee et al., 2009; S´anchez-Junquera et al., 2020; Zhou et al., 2004), demanding higher levels of cognitive engagement (Burgoon et al., 2010).”
BackgroundDetecting and Understanding Textual Deepfakes in Online Reviews
Kowalczyk, P., Röder, M., Dürr, A., & Thiesse, F. (2022) · Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.24251/hicss.2022.184 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, L., Burgoon, J. K., Nunamaker, J. F., & Twitchell, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, Baltimore County (US)
- University of Arizona (US)
- Venue
- Group Decision and Negotiation
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 81-106
- ISSN
- 0926-2644 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-9907
- OpenAlex
- W2035896792
- Cited by
- 440
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 25
- FWCI
- 14.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Group Decision and Negotiation (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Defense
- U.S. Air Force
- Air Force Office of Scientific Research
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Authorship Attribution and Profiling
- Keywords
- deception detection, linguistic cues, text analysis, uncertainty, informality, affect, text complexity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review