Cited by 142Computational and Text Analysis MethodsSentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningMental Health via Writing

Using natural language processing to analyse text data in behavioural science

Feuerriegel, Stefan, Maarouf, Abdurahman, Bär, Dominik, Geissler, Dominique, Schweisthal, Jonas, Pröllochs, Nicolas, Robertson, Claire E., Rathje, Steve +6 more·2025·Nature Reviews Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s44159-024-00392-z

Cites

168 of 168 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Creativity measurements can be obtained in subjective (e.g., human ratings) or objective (e.g., via metrics from natural language processing such as semantic distance or cosine similarity) ways.

    “Hence creativity measurements can be obtained in subjective (e.g., human ratings) or objective (e.g., via metrics from natural language processing such as semantic distance or cosine similarity [22]) ways.”
  • Prior work demonstrates that LLMs are a reliable tool for large-scale content analysis.

    “Yet, prior work demonstrates that LLMs are a reliable tool for largescale content analysis (Feuerriegel et al. 2025; Rathje et al. 2024)”

    From Characterizing AI-Generated Misinformation on Social Media (2025) · cites this paper as Feuerriegel et al. 2025

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Feuerriegel, S., Maarouf, A., Bär, D., Geissler, D., Schweisthal, J., Pröllochs, N., Robertson, C. E., Rathje, S., Hartmann, J., Mohammad, S. M., Netzer, O., Siegel, A. A., Plank, B., & Van Bavel, J. J.
Affiliations
  • Munich Center for Machine Learning (DE)
  • Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE)
  • New York University (US)
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • National Research Council Canada (CA)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Corresponding author
Feuerriegel, Stefan
Venue
Nature Reviews Psychology
Published
2025-01-02
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
96-111
ISSN
2731-0574 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4405971183
Cited by
140
References
168
Citations by year
2026: 84 · 2025: 56
FWCI
30.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • NPARC (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
Keywords
natural language processing, text analysis, behavioral science

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review