Cited by 220Geological and Geophysical StudiesGeological and Geochemical AnalysisGeological and Geophysical Studies Worldwide

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Geology of the Atlantis Massif (Mid-Atlantic Ridge, 30°N): Implications for the evolution of an ultramafic oceanic core complex

Blackman, Donna K., Karson, Jeffrey A., Kelley, Deborah S., Cann, Johnson R., Früh-Green, Gretchen L., Gee, Jeffrey S., Hurst, Stephen D., John, Barbara E., Morgan, Jennifer, Nooner, Scott L., Ross, D. Kent, Schroeder, Timothy J., Williams, Elizabeth A.·2002·Marine Geophysical Researches

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:mari.0000018232.14085.75

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The key difference between black smokers and alkaline chimneys is that alkaline chimneys form some distance from the mid-ocean ridge by serpentinization, the interaction of sea water via fissures in the seafloor and mantle rock in the underlying oceanic core complex.

    “The key difference between the black smokers and the alkaline chimneys is that the alkaline chimneys form some distance from the mid-ocean ridge by the process of serpentinization, the interaction of sea water via fissures in the seafloor and mantle rock in the underlying oceanic core complex [127,128,129].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Blackman, D. K., Karson, J. A., Kelley, D. S., Cann, J. R., Früh-Green, G. L., Gee, J. S., Hurst, S. D., John, B. E., Morgan, J., Nooner, S. L., Ross, D. K., Schroeder, T. J., & Williams, E. A.
Affiliations
  • Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • University of Wyoming (US)
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
Venue
Marine Geophysical Researches
Published
2002-09
Volume
23
Issue
5-6
Pages
443-469
ISSN
  • 0025-3235 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0581
OpenAlex
W2014892075
Cited by
220
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Marine Geophysical Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › Geological and Geophysical Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geophysical Studies Worldwide
Keywords
Atlantis Massif, oceanic core complex, Mid-Atlantic Ridge, detachment faulting, serpentinized peridotite, ultramafic rocks, brittle deformation, microstructure, Lost City hydrothermal field, gabbro, hydrothermal alteration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review