Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 168

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Agroforestry and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals

Garrity, D.P.·2004·Agroforestry Systems

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:agfo.0000028986.37502.7c

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. Alston J.M. and Pardey P.G. 2001. Attribution and other problems in assessing the returns to agricultural R&D. Agr Econ 25: 141–162. · DOI
  2. ASB. 2002. Balancing rainforest conservation and development. Alternatives to Slash-and-Burn, World Agroforestry Centre, Nairobi, Kenya.
  3. Bellefontaine R., Petit S., Pain-Orcet M., Deleporte P. and Bertault J. 2002. Trees Outside Forests: Towards Better Awareness. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome. 216 pp.
  4. Bread for the World Institute. 2003. Agriculture in the Global Economy. Bread for the World Institute, Washington, DC. 164 pp.
  5. CGIAR. 2000. A Food Secure World For All. Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research & Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome. 50 pp.
  6. Cunningham A.B., Scherr S.J. and McNeeley J.A. 2002. Matrix Matters: Biodiversity Research for Rural Landscape Mosaics. CIFOR and ICRAF, Bogor and Nairobi. 34 pp.
  7. Dixon J., Gulliver A., Gibbon D. (eds) 2001. Farming Systems and Poverty. Food and Agricdulture Organization, Rome.
  8. Franzel S., Cooper P., Denning G. and Eade D. 2002. Development and Agroforestry: Scaling Up the Impacts of Research. Oxfam, Oxford. 202 pp. · DOI
  9. Franzel S., Denning G.L., Lilisøe J.P., and Mercado A.R. Jr. 2004. Scaling up the impact of agroforestry: Lessons from three sites in Africa and Asia (This volume). · DOI
  10. Garrity D.P., Amoroso V.B., Koffa S., Catacutan D., Buenavista G., Fay P. and Dar W.D. 2003. Landcare on the poverty-protection interface in an Asian watershed. pp. 195–210. In: Campbell B.M. and Sayer J.A. (eds), Integrated Natural Resource Management: Linking Productivity, the Environment, and Development. CABI Publishing, Cambridge, MA, USA.
  11. Holmgren P., Masakha E.J., and Sjoholm H. 1994. Not all African land is being degraded: a recent survey of trees on farms in Kenya reveals rapidly increasing forest resources. Ambio 23: 390–395.
  12. Kumar B.M. and Nair P.K.R. 2004. The enigma of tropical homegardens (This volume). · DOI
  13. Leakey R.R.B. and Newton A.C. 1994. Domestication of 'Cinderella' species as the start of a woody-plant revolution. pp. 3–5. In: Leakey R.R.B. and Newton A.C. (eds), Tropical Trees: Potential for Domestication and the Rebuilding of Forest Resources. HMSO, London.
  14. McNeely J.A. 2004. Nature vs. Nurture: Managing Relationships Between Forests, Agroforestry and Wild Biodiversity (This volume). · DOI
  15. McNeely J. and Scherr S. 2003. Ecoagriculture: Strategies to Feed the World and Save Wild Biodiversity. Island Press, Washington DC. 323 pp.
  16. Mehra R. and Gammage S. 1999. Trends, countertrends and gaps in women's employment. World Dev 27(3): 538. · DOI
  17. Mellor J. 2001. Reducing poverty, buffering economic shocks-Agriculture and the non-tradable economy. Background Paper for Roles of Agriculture Project. Rome: FAO. 2 pp.
  18. Mercado A.R., Patindol M. and Garrity D.P. 2001. The Landcare experience in the Philippines: technical and institutional innovations for conservation farming. Dev in Practice 11: 495–508. · DOI
  19. Michon G., de Foresta H., and Levang P. 1995. Strategies agroforestieres paysannes at developpement durable: les agroforets a dammar de Sumatra. Natures, Sciences, Societes 3: 207–221. · DOI
  20. Montagnini F. and Nair P.K.R. 2004. Carbon sequestration: An underexploited environmental benefit of agroforest systems (This volume). · DOI
  21. Murniati, Garrity D.P. and Gintings A.N. 2001. The contribution of Agroforestry systems to reducing farmers' dependence on the resources of adjacent national parks: a case study from Sumatra, Indonesia. Agroforest Syst 52: 171–184. · DOI
  22. NAS. 1979. Tropical Legumes: Resources for the Future. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC. 332 pp.
  23. Omamo S.W. and Lynam J.K. 2002. Agricultural science and technology policy in Africa. Discussion Paper 02–01. International Service for National Agricultural Research, The Hague, The Netherlands. 49 pp.
  24. Place F. and Otsuka K. 2002. The role of tenure in the management of trees at the community level: Theoretical and empirical analyses from Uganda and Malawi. pp. 73–98. In: Meinzen-Dick, R., Knox, A., Place F. and Swallow B. (eds), Innovation in Natural Resource Management. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
  25. Place F. and Swallow B. 2002. Assessing the relationships between property rights and technology adoption in smallholder agriculture: Issues and empirical methods. pp. 45–71. In: Meinzen-Dick R., Knox A., Place F. and Swallow B. (eds), Innovation in Natural Resource Management. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  26. Place F.S., Franzel S., De Wolf R., Rommelse R., Kwesiga F.R., Nianf A.I., and Jama, B.A. 2002. Agroforestry for soil fertility replenishment: Evidence on adoption processes in Kenya and Zambia. In: Barrett, C.B., Place F. and Aboud A.A. (eds), Natural Resource Management Practices in Sub-Saharan Africa. CABI Publishing and International Centre for Research in Agroforestry, Wallingford, UK. 335 pp.
  27. Puri S. and Nair P.K.R. 2004. Agroforestry research for development in India: 25 years of experiences of a national program. (This volume). · DOI
  28. Rao M.R., Palada M.C. and Becker B.N. 2004. Medicinal and aromatic plants in agroforestry systems (This volume). · DOI
  29. Russell D. and Franzel S. 2004. Trees of prosperity: Agroforestry, markets and the African smallholder (This volume). · DOI
  30. Sanchez P.A. 2002. Soil fertility and hunger in Africa. Science 295: 2019–2020. · DOI
  31. Schreckenberg K., Degrande A., Mbosso Z., Baboule B., Boyd C., Enyong L., Kanmegne J. and Ngong C. 2002. The social and economic importance of Dacroydes edulis in Southern Cameroon. Forests, Trees and People: 12: 15–40.
  32. Shackleton S., Wynberg R., Sullivan C., Shackleton C., Leakey R., Mander M., McHardy T., den Adel S., Botelle A., du Plessis P., Lombard C., Combrinck A., Cunningham A., O'Regan D.and Laird S. 2003. Marula commercialisation for sustainable and equitable livelihoods: Synthesis of a southern African case study, Winners and Losers-Final Technical Report to DFID (FRP Project R7795), Volume 4, Appendix 3.5. 57 pp. · DOI
  33. Shepherd K. and Walsh M. 2002. Development of reflectance spectral libraries for characterization of soil properties. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66: 988–998. · DOI
  34. Simons A.J. 1996. ICRAF's strategy for domestication of non-wood tree products. pp. 8–22. In: Leakey R.R.B., Temu A.B., Melnyk M. and Vantomme P. (eds), Domestication and Commercialization of Non-Timber Forest Products in Agroforestry Systems. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.
  35. Simons A.J. and Leakey R.R.B. 2004. Tree domestication in tropical agroforestry (This volume). · DOI
  36. Swallow B., Garrity D. and van Noordwijk M. 2001. The effects of scales, flows, and filters on property rights and collective action in watershed management. Water Policy 3: 457–274. · DOI
  37. Temu A., Mwanje I. and Mogotsi K. 2003. Improving Agriculture and Natural Resources Education in Africa. World Agroforestry Centre, Nairobi, Kenya. 36 pp.
  38. Thirtle C., Irz X., Lin L., McKenzie-Hill V. and Wiggins S. 2001. Relationship between changes in agricultural productivity and the incidence of poverty in developing countries. United Kingdom Department for International Development Report 7946. pp. 2.
  39. Tomich T.P., Roemer M., and Vincent J. 1994. Development from a primary export base. pp. 151–194. In: Lindauer D. and Roemer M. (eds), Asia and Africa: Legacies and Opportunities in Development. Institute for Contemporary Studies, San Francisco.
  40. Tomich T.P., van Noordwijk M., Vosti S. and Witcover J. 1998. Agricultural development with rainforest conservation: Methods for seeking best bet alternatives to slash-and-burn, with applications to Brazil and Indonesia. Agr Econ 19: 159–174. · DOI
  41. UNDP. 2003. Human Development Report. United Nations Development Programme. New York. http://www.undp.org/hdr2003/.
  42. van Noordwijk M., Tomich T.P., de Foresta H. and Michon G. 1997. To segregate - or to integrate? Agroforestry Today, Jan-March pp. 6–7.
  43. van Noordwijk M., Tomich T.P. and Verbist B. 2003. Negotiation support models for integrated natural resource management in tropical forest margins. pp. 87–108. In: Campbell B.M. and Sayer J.A. (eds), Integrated Natural Resource Management: Linking Productivity, the Environment, and Development. CABI Publishing, Cambridge, MA, USA.
  44. Vandenbosch T., Taylor P., Beniest J. and Bekele-Tesemma A. 2002. Farmers of the Future - a strategy for action. World Agroforestry Centre, Nairobi, Kenya. 72 pp.
  45. Watson R., Noble I., Bolin B., Ravindranath N., Verardo D. and Dokken D. 2000. Land Use, Land-Use Change, and Forestry. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change & Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 377 pp.
  46. Young A. 1997. Agroforestry for Soil Management. 2nd edition. CAB International & International Centre for Research in Agroforestry, Wallingford/Nairobi. 288 pp. · DOI

Cited by

See all 168

Metadata

Authors
Garrity, D. P.
Venue
Agroforestry Systems
Published
2004-07
Volume
61-62
Issue
1-3
Pages
5-17
ISSN
  • 0167-4366
  • 1572-9680
Cited by
168
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.