The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Building opportunities for small-farm agroforestry to supply domestic wood markets in developing countries
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A small-scale decentralized approach is successful across industries [34, 44] but has not been researched and applied in California's recent history of mass timber.”
From DIY mass timber: development of low-tech and low-cost structural mass timber manufacturing to support forest utilization in California (2025) · cites this paper as [34]
Citations
Cites
Current Issues in Non-Timber Forest Products Research
rez, M. R. P., & Arnold, J. E. M. (1996) · Cited by 189
Scherr, S. J., White, A., & Kaimowitz, D. (2004) · CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) · Cited by 179
Self-citationTrees on the farm: assessing the adoption potential of agroforestry practices in Africa
(2002) · CABI Publishing eBooks · doi:10.1079/9780851995618.0000 · Cited by 176
Forest law enforcement and rural livelihoods
Kaimowitz, D. (2003) · The International Forestry Review · doi:10.1505/ifor.5.3.199.19146 · Cited by 175
Tree management in farmer strategies: responses to agricultural intensification
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-1532 · Cited by 108
Pinedo-Vasquez, M., Zarin, D. J., Coffey, K., Padoch, C., & Rabelo, F. (2001) · Human Ecology · doi:10.1023/a:1011064031078 · Cited by 106
White, A., & Martin, A. (2002) · Cited by 105
Agroforestry development: An environmental economic perspective
Alavalapati, J. R. R., Shrestha, R. K., Stainback, G. A., & Matta, J. R. (2004) · Advances in agroforestry · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-2424-1_21 · Cited by 103
Scaling up the impact of agroforestry: Lessons from three sites in Africa and Asia
Franzel, S., Denning, G., Lillesø, J. B., & Mercado, A. R. (2004) · Advances in agroforestry · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-2424-1_23 · Cited by 68
Agroforestry development: An environmental economic perspective
Alavalapati, J. R. R., Shrestha, R. K., Stainback, G. A., & Matta, J. R. (2004) · Agroforestry Systems · doi:10.1023/b:agfo.0000029006.64395.72 · Cited by 54
Scaling up the impact of agroforestry: Lessons from three sites in Africa and Asia
Franzel, S., Denning, G., Lillesø, J. B., & Mercado, A. R. (2004) · Agroforestry Systems · doi:10.1023/b:agfo.0000029008.71743.2d · Cited by 44
Current, D. A., Lutz, E., & Scherr, S. J. (1995) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 41
Self-citationForest Futures: Population, Consumption and Wood Resources
Gardner-Outlaw, T., & Engelman, R. (1999) · Cited by 27
Hellin, J., & Higman, S. (2003) · Practical Action Publishing eBooks · doi:10.3362/9781780441481 · Cited by 13
The new foresters: the role of private enterprise in the Indian forestry sector.
Saigal, S., Arora, H., & Rizvi, S. S. (2002) · OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) · Cited by 11
Robbins, C. S., & America, W. T. N. (2000) · Cited by 11
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- Arnold J.E.M., Liedholm C., Mead D. and Townson I.M. 1994. Structure and growth of small enterprises using forest products in southern and eastern Africa. OFI Occasional Paper No. 47. Oxford Forestry Institute, Oxford and GEMIN Working Paper No. 48. Growth equity through microenterprise investments and institutions. Gemini Project: Bethesda, MD, USA, 34 pp.
- ASB 2001. Deregulating agroforestry timber to fight poverty and protect the environment. ASB Policy Brief No. 3. Alternatives to Slash-and-Burn Programme, World Agroforestry Centre, Nairobi, Kenya, 4 pp.
- Atyi R.E. and Simula M. 2002. Forest certification: pending challenges for tropical timber. ITTO Technical Series No. 19. International Tropical Timber Organization, Yokohama, Japan, 59 pp.
- Bazett M. 2000. Long-term changes in the location and structure of forest industries. Global Vision 2050 for Forestry. World Bank/World Wildlife Fund Project, Washington, DC, 23 pp.
- Beer J., Ibrahim M. and Schlonvoigt A. 2000. Timber production in tropical agroforestry systems of Central America. pp. 777–786. In: Krishnapillay B., Soepadmo E., Lotfy Arshad N., Wong A., Appanah S., Wan Chik S., Manokaran N., Lay Tong H. and Kean Choon K. (eds), Forests and Society: The Role of Research. Sub-plenary Session, Vol. 1, XXI IUFRO World Congress, 7–12 August 2000, Kuala Lumpur. International Union of Forest Research Organizations Secretariat, Vienna, Austria and Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
- Colchester M., Apte T., Laforge M., Mandondo A. and Pathak N. 2003. Bridging the gap: communities, forests and international networks. CIFOR Occasional Paper No. 41. Synthesis report of the project 'Learning Lessons from International Community Forestry Networks.' Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia, 72 pp.
- Daley-Harris S. (ed.) 2002. Pathways out of Poverty: Innovations in Microfinance for the Poorest Families. Kumarian Press, Bloomfield, CT, 400 pp.
- Desmond H. and Race D. 2000. Global survey and analytical framework for forestry out-grower arrangements. Final Report submitted to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. Australian National University Forestry, Canberra, Australia, 54 pp.
- DeWalt B.R., Olivera F.G. and Correa J.L.B. 2000. Mid-term evaluation of the Mexico Community Forestry Project. World Bank, Washington, DC, 18 pp.
- FAO 2003. State of the World's Forests. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy, 152 pp.
- FAO 2001. FAOSTAT. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy.
- FAO 1998. FAOSTAT. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy.
- FFAQI 2000. Portable sawmills: weighing up the potential for onfarm processing. RIRDS Short Report No. 38. Forest Farmers Association of Queensland Inc., Highgate Hill, Australia.
- Fisher R.J. 2001. Poverty alleviation and forests: experiences from Asia. Regional Community Forestry Training Center for Asia and the Pacific, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
- Ford Foundation 1998. Forestry for Sustainable Rural Development. A Review of Ford Foundation-Supported Community Forestry Programs in Asia. Ford Foundation, New York, NY, 58 pp.
- ICRAF, World Agroforestry Centre 2001. Negotiation support system for natural resource conflict resolution to enhance environmental services in Southeast Asia. EAPEI proposal. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Nairobi, Kenya.
- IIED 1996. Towards a Sustainable Paper Cycle: An Independent Study on the Sustainability of the Pulp and Paper Industry. Report prepared for the World Business Council for Sustainable Development. International Institute for Environment and Development, London, UK, 258 pp.
- Imhoff D. 1999. The Simple Life Guide to Tree-Free, Recycled and Certified Papers. Simplelife: Philo, California.
- Lecup I. and Nicholson K. 2000. Community-Based Tree and Forest Product Enterprises: Market Analysis and Development Field Manual. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy, 195 pp.
- Mayers J. and Vermeulen S. 2002. Company-Community Forestry Partnerships: From Raw Deals to Mutual Gains? Instruments for Sustainable Private Sector Forestry Series. International Institute for Environment and Development, London, UK, 176 pp.
- Poffenberger M. (ed.) 1996. Communities and forest management. A report of the IUCN Working Group on Community Involvement in Forest Management, with recommendations to the Intergovernmental Panel on Forests. IUCN-The World Conservation Union, Washington DC, 44 pp.
- Poschen P. and Lougren M. 2001. Globalization and sustainability: the forestry and wood industries on the move. Report for discussion at the Tripartite Meeting on the Social and Labour Dimensions of the Forestry and Wood Industries on the Move. International Labour Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 125 pp.
- Puri S. and Nair P.K.R. 2004. Agroforestry research for development in India: 25 years of experiences of a national program (this volume). Raintree J.B. and Francisco H.A. (eds) 1994. Marketing of multipurpose tree products in Asia. Proceedings of an international workshop held in Baguio City, Philippines, 6–9 December 1993. Winrock International, Bangkok, Thailand, pp. 289–300.
- Scherr S.J. 1995. Meeting household needs: farmer tree-growing strategies in western Kenya, pp. 141–173. In: Arnold J.E.M. and Dewees P.A. (eds). Tree Management in Farmer Strategies: Responses to Agricultural Intensification. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
- Simons A.J., Jaenicke H., Tchoundjeu Z., Dawson I., Kindt R., Oginosako Z., Lengkeek A. and De Grande A. 2000. The future of trees is on farm: tree domestication in Africa, pp. 752–760. In: Krishnapillay B., Soepadmo E., Lotfy Arshad N., Wong A., Appanah S., Wan Chik S., Manokaran N., Lay Tong H. and Kean Choon K. (eds). Forests and Society: The Role of Research. Sub-plenary Session, Vol. 1, XXI IUFRO World Congress, 7–12 August 2000, Kuala Lumpur. International Union of Forest Research Organizations Secretariat, Vienna, Austria and Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
- Smeraldi R. and Verissimo A. 1999. Hitting the target: timber consumption in the Brazilian domestic market and promotion of forest certification. Amigos da Terra - Programa Amazonia, São Paulo, Brazil, 41 pp.
- Vlosky R.P. and Aguirre J.A. 2001. Increasing marketing opportunities of lesser known wood species and secondary wood products in tropical Central America and Mexico. Louisiana Forest Products Development Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge. August, 6 pp.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Agroforestry and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals
Garrity, D. P. (2004) · Agroforestry Systems · doi:10.1023/b:agfo.0000028986.37502.7c · Cited by 412
The Dry forests and woodlands of Africa: managing for products and services
Chidumayo, E. N., & Gumbo, D. J. (2011) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.48-3271 · Cited by 111
Trees of prosperity: Agroforestry, markets and the African smallholder
Russell, D., & Franzel, S. (2004) · Agroforestry Systems · doi:10.1023/b:agfo.0000029009.53337.33 · Cited by 93
Bensel, T. (2008) · Land Degradation and Development · doi:10.1002/ldr.862 · Cited by 72
Timber yield from smallholder agroforestry systems in Nicaragua and Honduras
de Sousa, K., Detlefsen, G., Filho, E. D. M. V., Tobar, D., & Casanoves, F. (2015) · Agroforestry Systems · doi:10.1007/s10457-015-9846-2 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Scherr, S. J.
- Affiliations
- Forest Trends (US)
- Corresponding author
- Scherr, S.J.
- Venue
- Agroforestry Systems
- Published
- 2004-07
- Volume
- 61-62
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 357-370
- ISSN
- 0167-4366 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-9680
- OpenAlex
- W4237466272
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Agroforestry Systems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Forest Management and Policy
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Forest Ecology and Conservation
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › African Botany and Ecology Studies
- Keywords
- developing countries, pulpwood, wood supply chain, forest policy, farmer groups, business partnerships
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review