The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Primordial Stakeholder: Advancing the Conceptual Consideration of Stakeholder Status for the Natural Environment
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches
Suchman, M. C. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258788 · Cited by 19,903
A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance
Carroll, A. B. (1979) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257850 · Cited by 10,480
The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258887 · Cited by 5,846
WHY COMPANIES GO GREEN: A MODEL OF ECOLOGICAL RESPONSIVENESS.
Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/1556363 · Cited by 4,020
Moving beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences
Rowley, T. J. (1997) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1997.9711022107 · Cited by 2,522
Strategy‐making and environment: The third link
Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1983) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250040304 · Cited by 1,986
Environmental Scarcities and Violent Conflict: Evidence from Cases
Homer-Dixon, T. F. (1994) · International Security · doi:10.2307/2539147 · Cited by 1,701
STAKEHOLDER MISMATCHING: A THEORETICAL PROBLEM IN EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE
Wood, D. J., & Jones, R. E. (1995) · The International Journal of Organizational Analysis · doi:10.1108/eb028831 · Cited by 1,069
Laverty, K. J. (1996) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1996.9702100316 · Cited by 690
A Selective Review of Time Assumptions in Strategy Research
Mosakowski, E., & Earley, P. C. (2000) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259207 · Cited by 279
Cited by
Do circular economy business models capture intended environmental value propositions?
Manninen, K., Koskela, S., Antikainen, R., Bocken, N., Dahlbo, H., & Aminoff, A. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.003 · Cited by 488
Business cases for sustainability: a stakeholder theory perspective
Schaltegger, S., Hörisch, J., & Freeman, R. E. (2019) · Organization & Environment · doi:10.1177/1086026617722882 · Cited by 477
Global value chains from a 3D printing perspective
Laplume, A. O., Petersen, B., & Pearce, J. M. (2016) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/jibs.2015.47 · Cited by 347
Neville, B. A., Bell, S. J., & Whitwell, G. J. (2011) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0818-9 · Cited by 275
Metadata
- Authors
- Driscoll, C., & Starik, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Business Ethics
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 55-73
- ISSN
- 0167-4544 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0697
- OpenAlex
- W2053745686
- Cited by
- 504
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 19.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Primordial Stakeholder: Advancing the Conceptual Consideration of Stakeholder Status for the Natural Environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1023/b:busi.0000013852.62017.0e
- The paper
- Driscoll, C., & Starik, M. (2004). The Primordial Stakeholder: Advancing the Conceptual Consideration of Stakeholder Status for the Natural Environment. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1023/b%3Abusi.0000013852.62017.0e
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
