Cited by 33Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchSleep and related disordersRestless Legs Syndrome Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dream content in patients with narcolepsy: preliminary findings

Schredl, Michael·1998·Dreaming

Abstract

The present study investigated dream recall and dream content in patients with narcolepsy. Compared to healthy controls, patients with narcolepsy reported higher dream recall frequency and more negatively toned and bizarre dreams, confirming earlier findings.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:drem.0000005900.63728.a7

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 9 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Schredl, M.
Affiliations
Central Institute of Mental Health (DE)
Corresponding author
Schredl, Michael
Venue
Dreaming
Published
1998-06
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
103-107
ISSN
  • 1053-0797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3351
OpenAlex
W2044277534
Cited by
33
References
9
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Dreaming (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Restless Legs Syndrome Research
Keywords
narcolepsy, dream recall, dream content, dream frequency, REM sleep

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review