Cited by 35Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentBehavioral and Psychological StudiesChild Therapy and Development

Assessment of parenting practices related to conduct problems: development and validation of the Management of Children's Behavior Scale

Perepletchikova, Francheska, Kazdin, Alan E.·2004·Journal of Child and Family Studies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:jcfs.0000044723.45902.70

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perepletchikova, F., & Kazdin, A. E.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Kazdin, Alan E.
Venue
Journal of Child and Family Studies
Published
2004-12
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
385-403
ISSN
  • 1062-1024 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2843
OpenAlex
W2047569627
Cited by
35
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Child and Family Studies (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Leon Lowenstein Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Therapy and Development
Keywords
parenting practices, conduct problems, scale validation, parent management training, child behavior problems, outpatient care, concurrent validity, predictive validity, incremental validity, treatment response

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review