The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of nano-scaled particles on endothelial cell function in vitro: Studies on viability, proliferation and inflammation
Open accessAbstract
Recent studies give support for a connection between the presence of inorganic particles (of μm and nm size) in different organs and tissues and the development of inflammatory foci, called granulomas. As the potential source of particles (e.g. porcelain dental bridges) and the location of particle detection were topographically far apart, a distribution via the blood stream appears highly probable. Thus, endothelial cells, which line the inner surface of blood vessels, would come into direct contact with these particles, making particle–endothelial interactions potentially pathogenically relevant. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects that five different nano-scaled particles (PVC, TiO2, SiO2, Co, Ni) have on endothelial cell function and viability. Therefore, human endothelial cells were exposed to different amounts of the above-mentioned particles. Although most particle types are shown to be internalised (except Ni-particles), only Co-particles possessed cytotoxic effects. Furthermore, an impairment of the proliferative activity and a pro-inflammatory stimulation of endothelial cells were induced by exposure to Co- and, to a lesser extent, by SiO2-particles. If a pro-inflammatory stimulation of endothelial cells occurs in vivo, a chronic inflammation could be a possible consequence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Passage of inhaled particles into the blood circulation in humans
Nemmar, A., Hoet, P. H. M., Vanquickenborne, B., Dinsdale, D., Thomeer, M., Hoylaerts, M. F., Vanbilloen, H., Mortelmans, L., & Nemery, B. (2002) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/hc0402.104118 · Cited by 1,719
Cited by
Nanomaterials and nanoparticles: Sources and toxicity
Buzea, C., Pacheco, I. I., & Robbie, K. (2007) · Biointerphases · doi:10.1116/1.2815690 · Cited by 3,789
Gurr, J.-R., Wang, A. S. S., Chen, C.-H., & Jan, K.-Y. (2005) · Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.tox.2005.05.007 · Cited by 1,022
Toxicity and Environmental Risks of Nanomaterials: Challenges and Future Needs
RAY, P. C., YU, H., & FU, P. P. (2009) · Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part C · doi:10.1080/10590500802708267 · Cited by 936
Long, T. C., Saleh, N., Tilton, R. D., Lowry, G. V., & Veronesi, B. (2006) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es060589n · Cited by 870
In vitro toxicity of silica nanoparticles in human lung cancer cells
Lin, W., Huang, Y.-W., Zhou, X.-D., & Ma, Y. (2006) · Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.taap.2006.10.004 · Cited by 852
Metadata
- Authors
- Peters, K., Unger, R. E., Kirkpatrick, C. J., Gatti, A. M., & Monari, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 321-325
- ISSN
- 0957-4530 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-4838
- OpenAlex
- W2029599627
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of nano-scaled particles on endothelial cell function in vitro: Studies on viability, proliferation and inflammation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1023/b:jmsm.0000021095.36878.1b
- The paper
- Peters, K., Unger, R. E., Kirkpatrick, C. J., Gatti, A. M., & Monari, E. (2004). Effects of nano-scaled particles on endothelial cell function in vitro: Studies on viability, proliferation and inflammation. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1023/b%3Ajmsm.0000021095.36878.1b
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.