Sedimentological Interpretation of the Tonto Group Stratigraphy (Grand Canyon Colorado River)1
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The finding that stratigraphic divisions do not correspond to sedimentary genesis has been confirmed by experiment.
“This has been confirmed by experiment [36], [37](see Figure 2).”
From The Search for Solutions to Mysterious Anomalies in the Geologic Column (2019) · cites this paper as [36]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Search for Solutions to Mysterious Anomalies in the Geologic Column
(2019) · Geology, Earth & Marine Sciences · doi:10.31038/gems.2019114 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Berthault, G.
- Corresponding author
- Berthault, G.
- Venue
- Lithology and Mineral Resources
- Published
- 2004-09
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 480-484
- ISSN
- 0024-4902 (ISSN-L)
- 1608-3229
- OpenAlex
- W2167728458
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Lithology and Mineral Resources (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Geological formations and processes
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › Geological Studies and Exploration
- Keywords
- sedimentology, stratigraphy, sedimentation conditions, Grand Canyon, Colorado River, stratigraphic division, sedimentary genesis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
