Awareness and Acceptance of Current Food Safety Recommendations During Pregnancy
Abstract
Objectives To better understand pregnant women's food safety attitudes and beliefs that affect food selection, preparation and handling behaviors, sources of food safety information, motivators and barriers to adopting current recommendations, and preferences for receiving food safety materials. Methods Eleven focus groups were conducted with 69 women (57 pregnant and 12 less than 6 months postpartum). The Health Belief Model guided development of the moderator's guide. In the presence of each focus group, participants completed a food safety attitude/behavior questionnaire. Sessions were audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed for common themes across and within groups. Results Most participants indicated moderate concern about food safety and had made some food handling or consumption changes since becoming pregnant; however, many were not following 7 of the 12 specific recommendations discussed. Further, there was resistance to change habits, especially for less well-known recommendations. The women assumed their food is safe, and wanted strong evidence regarding why they should change current practices. Common barriers included lack of prior awareness of most recommendations, no prior illness from implicated foods and the convenience, perceived health benefits of, and personal preference for many risky foods discussed. Participants wanted food safety information that was quick and easy to read, sufficiently thorough, and specifically targeted to pregnant women. Conclusions…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The categorization of 'risky' foods during pregnancy varies across national contexts.
“The categorization of “risky” foods during pregnancy also varies across national contexts (Athearn et al. 2004).”
From The Politics of Postgenomic Reproduction: Exploring Pregnant Narratives from within a Clinical Trial (2022) · cites this paper as Athearn et al. 2004
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Young, I., & Waddell, L. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0167695 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Nieto-Montenegro, S., Brown, J. L., & LaBorde, L. F. (2008) · Food Control · doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2007.07.005 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Feng, Y., & Bruhn, C. M. (2019) · Journal of Food Protection · doi:10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-18-245 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
The Politics of Postgenomic Reproduction: Exploring Pregnant Narratives from within a Clinical Trial
Valdez, N. (2022) · Science, Technology, & Human Values · doi:10.1177/01622439211066759 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Athearn, P. N., Kendall, P. A., Hillers, V. ‘., Schroeder, M., Bergmann, V., Chen, G., & Medeiros, L. C.
- Affiliations
- Colorado State University (US)
- Washington State University (US)
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kendall, Patricia A.
- Venue
- Maternal and Child Health Journal
- Published
- 2004-09
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 149-162
- ISSN
- 1092-7875 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6628
- OpenAlex
- W1977790781
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 6.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Maternal and Child Health Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Agriculture
- Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Keywords
- food safety, pregnancy, pregnant women, food safety attitudes, food handling behavior, Health Belief Model, barriers to behavior change, food safety information, postpartum women, food safety education, maternal nutrition
- MeSH terms
- Attitude, Awareness, Female, Food Preferences, Humans, Maternal Welfare, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Nutrition Policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review