Cited by 87Food Safety and HygieneOccupational Health and Safety ResearchOccupational Health and Safety in Workplaces

Development and assessment of pilot food safety educational materials and training strategies for Hispanic workers in the mushroom industry using the Health Action Model

Nieto-Montenegro, Sergio, Brown, J. Lynne, LaBorde, Luke F.·2008·Food Control

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodcont.2007.07.005

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nieto-Montenegro, S., Brown, J. L., & LaBorde, L. F.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Nieto-Montenegro, Sergio
Venue
Food Control
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-06
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
616-633
ISSN
0956-7135 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1988665290
Cited by
87
References
55
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 12
FWCI
2.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Food Control (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Pennsylvania State University
  • National Cancer Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Radiological and Ultrasound Technology › Occupational Health and Safety Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
Keywords
food safety training, Hispanic workers, mushroom industry, hand washing, financial incentives, food safety knowledge, food safety behavior, needs assessment, food production workers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review