CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,272Health Policy Implementation ScienceHealth Sciences Research and EducationPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mental Health Provider Attitudes Toward Adoption of Evidence-Based Practice: The Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS)

Aarons, Gregory A.·2004·Mental Health Services Research
DOI 10.1023/b:mhsr.0000024351.12294.65
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Unlabelled Mental health provider attitudes toward organizational change have not been well studied. Dissemination and implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) into real-world settings represent organizational change that may be limited or facilitated by provider attitudes toward adoption of new treatments, interventions, and practices. A brief measure of mental health provider attitudes toward adoption of EBPs was developed and attitudes were examined in relation to a set of provider individual difference and organizational characteristics.Methods Participants were 322 public sector clinical service workers from 51 programs providing mental health services to children and adolescents and their families.Results Four dimensions of attitudes toward adoption of EBPs were identified: (1) intuitive Appeal of EBP, (2) likelihood of adopting EBP given Requirements to do so, (3) Openness to new practices, and (4) perceived Divergence of usual practice with research-based/academically developed interventions. Provider attitudes varied by education level, level of experience, and organizational context.Conclusions Attitudes toward adoption of EBPs can be reliably measured and vary in relation to individual differences and service context. EBP implementation plans should include consideration of mental health service provider attitudes as a potential aid to improve the process and effectiveness of dissemination efforts.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:mhsr.0000024351.12294.65

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 60 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Aarons, G. A., Woodbridge, M., & Carmazzi, A. (2003). Examining leadership, organizational climate and service quality in a children's system of care. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Research Conference. A System of Care for Children's Mental Health: Expanding the Research Base, Tampa, FL.
  2. Baldassare, M., Shires, M. A., Hoene, C., & Koffman, A. (2000). Risky business: Providing local public services in Los Angeles County (ISBN 1-58213-022-1). San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
  3. Dunn, G., Everitt, B., & Pickles, A. (1993). Modeling covariances and latent variables using EQS. London: Chapman & Hall.
  4. Hasenfeld, Y. (Ed.). (1992). Human services as complex organizations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  5. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998). Mplus user's guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
  6. Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  7. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.
  8. Thyer, B. A., & Polk, G. (1997). Social work and psychology professors' scholarly productivity: A controlled comparison of cited journal articles. Journal of Applied Social Sciences, 21, 105-110.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 601–700 of 1,001

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Aarons, G. A.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Aarons, Gregory A.
ORCID
Aarons, Gregory A.
Venue
Mental Health Services Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2004-06
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
61-74
ISSN
  • 1522-3434 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6636
DOI
10.1023/b:mhsr.0000024351.12294.65
OpenAlex
W2132091551
Cited by
1,272
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 74 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 117 · 2020: 102 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 76 · 2017: 64 · 2016: 69 · 2015: 82 · 2014: 72 · 2013: 63 · 2012: 49
FWCI
33.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Mental Health Services Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH01695, K01MH001695)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
evidence-based practice, mental health professionals, provider attitudes, attitude measurement, organizational change, dissemination and implementation, child and adolescent mental health services, individual differences, organizational context
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attitude of Health Personnel, California, Data Collection, Diffusion of Innovation, Health Personnel, Health Services Research, Humans, Mental Health Services, Organizational Innovation, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review