Cited by 9,587Psychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychology Research and BibliometricsMental Health Research Topics

Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research.

Fabrigar, Leandre R., Wegener, Duane T., MacCallum, Robert C., Strahan, Erin J.·1999·Psychological Methods

Abstract

Despite the widespread use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research, researchers often make questionable decisions when conducting these analyses. This article reviews the major design and analytical decisions that must be made when conducting a factor analysis and notes that each of these decisions has important consequences for the obtained results. Recommendations that have been made in the methodological literature are discussed. Analyses of 3 existing empirical data sets are used to illustrate how questionable decisions in conducting factor analyses can yield problematic results. The article presents a survey of 2 prominent journals that suggests that researchers routinely conduct analyses using such questionable methods. The implications of these practices for psychological research are discussed, and the reasons for current practices are reviewed. Since its initial development nearly a century ago (Spearman, 1904, 1927), exploratory factor analysis (EFA) has been one of the most widely used statistical procedures in psychological research. Despite this

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1082-989x.4.3.272

Cites

128 of 128 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J.
Affiliations
Queen's University (CA)
Venue
Psychological Methods
Published
1999-09
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
272-299
ISSN
  • 1082-989X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1463
OpenAlex
W1977775666
Cited by
9,587
References
128
Citations by year
2026: 777 · 2025: 658 · 2024: 598 · 2023: 548 · 2022: 538 · 2021: 577 · 2020: 526 · 2019: 528 · 2018: 476 · 2017: 452 · 2016: 461 · 2015: 472 · 2014: 478 · 2013: 413 · 2012: 346
FWCI
40.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Methods (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
exploratory factor analysis, questionable research practices, methodological recommendations, research integrity, publication practices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review