The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From Contextualism to Contrastivism
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures
Chomsky, N. (1993) · Mouton eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110884166 · Cited by 8,541
Relevance: Communication and Cognition
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986) · Cited by 6,708
Levinson, S. C. (1983) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511813313 · Cited by 5,137
(2000) · Cited by 5,055
Fraassen, B. C. V. (1980) · doi:10.1093/0198244274.001.0001 · Cited by 4,682
Relevance. Communication and cognition
Stoerig, P. (1987) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(87)90070-4 · Cited by 3,904
Demopoulos, W., & van Fraassen, B. C. (1982) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2184804 · Cited by 3,311
American Philosophical Quarterly
(2023) · American Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.5406/21521123.60.4.09 · Cited by 3,225
A theory of focus interpretation
Rooth, M. (1992) · Natural Language Semantics · doi:10.1007/bf02342617 · Cited by 3,194
Williamson, T. (2002) · doi:10.1093/019925656x.001.0001 · Cited by 2,788
Metadata
- Authors
- Schaffer, J.
- Venue
- Philosophical Studies
- Published
- 2004-05
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 73-103
- ISSN
- 0031-8116 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0883
- OpenAlex
- W2015118265
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 105.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: From Contextualism to Contrastivism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1023/b:phil.0000029351.56460.8c
- The paper
- Schaffer, J. (2004). From Contextualism to Contrastivism. Philosophical Studies. https://doi.org/10.1023/b%3Aphil.0000029351.56460.8c
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
