CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 83Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsFamily and Matrimonial Law

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

“If I Killed You, I'd Get the Kids”: Women's Survival and Protection Work with Child Custody and Access in the Context of Woman Abuse

Varcoe, Colleen, Irwin, Lori G.·2004·Qualitative Sociology
DOI 10.1023/b:quas.0000015545.82803.90
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:quas.0000015545.82803.90

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Boyd, S. (1990). Potentialities and perils of the primary caregiver presumption. Canadian Family Law Quarterly, 7, 1-30.
  2. Campbell, M., Copeland, B., & Tate, E. (1998). Taking the standpoint of people with disabilities in research: Experiences with participation. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation, 12, 95-104.
  3. Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics. (1993). Violence Against Women Survey highlights and questionnaire package. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
  4. Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. (1988). Research as social action: The struggle for battered women. In K. Yllö & M. Bograd (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 51-74). Newbury Park: Sage.
  5. Drakich, J. (1988). In whose best interest? The politics of joint custody. In B. Fox (Ed.), Family bonds and gender divisions (pp. 477-496). Toronto, ON: Canadian Scholars' Press.
  6. Fay, J. (1999). Beyond saints and sinners: Equality and the ideological construction of single mothers on social assistance. Vancouver, BC: West Coast Leaf National Forum on Equality Rights.
  7. Goundry, S. A. (1998). Final report on court-related harassment and family law “justice.” Vancouver, BC: BC/Yukon Women's Program, Status of Women Canada, Feminist Research, Education, Development and Action Centre (FREDA), and Vancouver Association of Women and the Law (VAWL).
  8. Graycar, R. (1989). Equal rights versus fathers' rights: The child custody debate in Australia. In C. Smart & S. Sevenhuijsen (Eds.), Child custody and the politics of gender (pp. 158-189). London: Routledge.
  9. Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1995). Ethnography: Principles in practice, 2nd edition. London: Routledge.
  10. Henderson, A. (1993). Abused women's perceptions of their children's experiences. Canada's Mental Health, 4, 7-11.
  11. Johnson, H. (1996). Dangerous domains: Violence against women in Canada. Scarborough, ON: International Thomson Publishing.
  12. Kaganas, F., & Sclater, S. D. (2000). Contact and domestic violence: The winds of change. Family Law, 30, 630-636.
  13. Lehman, F. (1996). Factoring domestic violence into child custody cases. Trial, 32, 32-40.
  14. Lye, D. N., & Wechsler, M. (2000). Review of the 1999 Parenting Act Study. Washington State Bar News, retrieved July 8, 2001 (www2.wsba.org/barnews/2000/07/lye-wechsler.htm).
  15. Morse, J. (1986). Quantitative and qualitative research: Issues in sampling. In P. L. Chinn (Ed.), Nursing research methodology: Issues and implementation (pp. 181-193). Rockville, MD: Aspen.
  16. Park, P. (1993). What is participatory research? A theoretical and methodological perspective. In P. Park, M. Brydon-Miller, B. Hall, & T. Jackson (Eds.), Voices of change: Participatory research in the United States and Canada (pp. 1-19). London: Bergin & Garvey.
  17. Reid, G. (1998). Documenting impact of legal aid cuts on women. Vancouver, BC: Vancouver Center for Research on Violence Against Women and Children.
  18. Taylor, G., Barnsley, J., & Goldsmith, P. (1996). Women and children last: Custody and access disputes and the family “justice” system. Vancouver, BC: Vancouver Custody and Access Support and Advocacy Association.
  19. Varcoe, C., Jaffer, F., & Irwin, L. (2002). Abuse through child custody and access: A critical site of women's work. Vancouver: University of Victoria Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 83

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Varcoe, C., & Irwin, L. G.
Affiliations
University of Victoria (CA)
Corresponding author
Varcoe, Colleen
ORCID
Varcoe, Colleen
Venue
Qualitative Sociology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2004-03
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
77-99
ISSN
  • 0162-0436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7837
DOI
10.1023/b:quas.0000015545.82803.90
OpenAlex
W2043725376
Cited by
83
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 15 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Qualitative Sociology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Law › Family and Matrimonial Law
Keywords
intimate partner violence, domestic violence, child custody, child visitation rights, women's survival strategies, gender-based violence, gender neutrality, women's employment, father-child relationship, gender analysis, child protection, family law policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review