Cited by 37Regulation and Compliance StudiesLaw, Economics, and Judicial SystemsLegal and Constitutional Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Toward a Synthesis of Models of Regulatory Policy Design with Limited Information

Armstrong, Mark, Sappington, David E. M.·2004·Journal of Regulatory Economics

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:rege.0000028011.71612.70

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 37

Metadata

Authors
Armstrong, M., & Sappington, D. E. M.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
  • Armstrong, Mark
  • Sappington, David E. M.
Venue
Journal of Regulatory Economics
Published
2004-07
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
5-21
ISSN
  • 0922-680X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0468
OpenAlex
W2082726337
Cited by
36
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
12.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Regulatory Economics (publishedVersion)
  • Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Regulation and Compliance Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Legal and Constitutional Studies
Keywords
regulatory design, information asymmetry, limited information, regulatory models, model synthesis, regulatory economics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review