CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 216Cybernetics and Technology in SocietyPhilosophy and Theoretical ScienceNeurology and Historical Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The First Computational Theory of Mind and Brain: A Close Look at Mcculloch and Pitts's “Logical Calculus of Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity”

Piccinini, Gualtiero·2004·Synthese
DOI 10.1023/b:synt.0000043018.52445.3e
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:synt.0000043018.52445.3e

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Arbib, M. A.: 1989, 'Comments on “A Logical Calculus of the Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity”, in R. McCulloch (ed.), COLLECTED WORKS OF WARREN S. MCCULLOCH, Intersystems, Salinas, CA, pp. 341–342.
  2. Boden, M.: 1991, ‘Horses of a Different Color?’ in W. Ramsey, S. P. Stich and D. E. Rumelhart (eds.), Philosophy and Connectionist Theory, LEA, Hillsdale, pp. 3–19.
  3. Fodor, J. A.: 1981, Representations, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  4. Hodges, A.: 1983. Alan Turing: The Enigma, Simon and Schuster, New York.
  5. Lettvin, J. L.: 1989a, ‘Introduction’, in R. McCulloch (ed.), Collected Works of Warren S. McCulloch, Vol. 1. Intersystems, Salinas, CA, 7–20.
  6. Lettvin, J. L.: 1989b, ‘Strychnine Neuronography’, in R. McCulloch (ed.), Collected Works of Warren S. McCulloch, Vol. 1. Intersystems, Salinas, CA, 50–58.
  7. McCulloch, W. S.: 1940, ‘Joannes Gregorius Dusser de Barenne’, Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine 12, 743–746.
  8. McCulloch, W. S.: 1961, ‘What Is a Number, that a Man May Know It, and a Man, that He May Know a Number?’ General Semantics Bulletin 26/27, 7-18. Reprinted in McCulloch 1965, pp. 1–18
  9. Moreno Díaz, R. and J. Mira (eds.): 1996, Brain Processes, Theories, and Models: An International Conference in Honor of W. S. McCulloch 25 Years after His Death, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  10. Rashevsky, N.: 1936b, ‘Physico-Mathematical Methods in Biological and Social Sciences’, Erkenntnis 6, 357–365.
  11. Shannon, C. E. and J. McCarthy: 1956, Automata Studies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  12. Shapiro, S.: 1998, ‘Church's Thesis’, in E. Craig (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, V. 2, Routledge, London, pp. 351–355.
  13. Turing, A. M.: 1948, ‘Intelligent Machinery’, in D. Ince (ed.) Mechanical Intelligence. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 87–106.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 216

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Piccinini, G.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Piccinini, Gualtiero
ORCID
Piccinini, Gualtiero
Venue
Synthese
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2004-08
Volume
141
Issue
2
Pages
175-215
ISSN
  • 0039-7857 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0964
DOI
10.1023/b:synt.0000043018.52445.3e
OpenAlex
W2046606639
Cited by
215
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
19.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Synthese (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurology and Historical Studies
Keywords
computational theory of mind, mind-body problem, artificial neural networks, finite automata, digital circuit design, history of artificial intelligence, history of neuroscience, history of computing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review