Does the Use of Gender-Fair Language Influence the Comprehensibility of Texts?: An Experiment Using an Authentic Contract Manipulating Single Role Nouns and Pronouns
Abstract
In many languages masculine nouns and pronouns can be interpreted to refer to both male and female referents. However, even when the authors expressly point out that masculine forms are being used to refer to both women and men, readers and listeners predominantly form mental images of men. A gender-fair language that uses either masculine and feminine forms or gender-neutral forms to refer to women and men more equally elicits mental images of women and men. Critics often argue, however, that gender-fair language makes texts less comprehensible (readable). The present study tests this assumption for the German language: 355 students read a randomly assigned text that either used masculine-only forms or consistently used both masculine and feminine forms. After that, they answered the comprehensibility questionnaire by Friedrich (2017) . Participants who had read a text in gender-fair language did not give statistically significant lower ratings of comprehensibility than participants who had read a text that used masculine-only forms (partial η2 .05). The results indicate that the use of gender-fair language does not impair the comprehensibility of texts.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Gender-fair forms mitigate male-biased mental representations and disadvantageous decisions.
“Gender-fair forms have been shown to mitigate these tendencies and to constitute no linguistic barrier for individuals, regardless of their educational background (Friedrich and Heise, 2019; Pabst and Kollmayer, 2023; Renström et al., 2022);”
From What affects people’s use of and attitudes toward gender-inclusive language? A literature review (2025) · cites this paper as Friedrich and Heise, 2019
Gender-fair forms constitute no linguistic barrier for individuals, regardless of their educational background.
“Gender-fair forms have been shown to mitigate these tendencies and to constitute no linguistic barrier for individuals, regardless of their educational background (Friedrich and Heise, 2019; Pabst and Kollmayer, 2023; Renström et al., 2022);”
From What affects people’s use of and attitudes toward gender-inclusive language? A literature review (2025) · cites this paper as Friedrich and Heise, 2019
The finding that comprehensibility ratings do not differ by text version contradicts the idea that gender-inclusive language is inherently harder to understand and therefore less accepted.
“This finding contradicts the idea that gender-inclusive language is inherently harder to understand (for converging evidence see also Friedrich and Heise, 2019) and, therefore, less accepted.”
From What affects people’s use of and attitudes toward gender-inclusive language? A literature review (2025) · cites this paper as Friedrich and Heise, 2019
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Renström, E. A. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1507858 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
What affects people’s use of and attitudes toward gender-inclusive language? A literature review
Lange, E., & von Stockhausen, L. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1657753 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Friedrich, M. C. G., & Heise, E.
- Affiliations
- Technische Universität Braunschweig (DE)
- Venue
- Swiss Journal of Psychology
- Publisher
- Hogrefe Publishing Group
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 51-60
- ISSN
- 1421-0185 (ISSN-L)
- 1662-0879
- OpenAlex
- W2941374545
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 6.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Swiss Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies in Language
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistic research and analysis
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Media, Gender, and Advertising
- Keywords
- gender-inclusive language, gender-neutral language, text comprehensibility, readability, gender stereotypes, mental imagery, German language
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review