Cited by 3Ethics and bioethics in healthcarePalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic Care

Provide Access to Information on Assisted Suicide for a Patient with a Diagnosis of Depression?: An Ethics Consultation

Winkler, Laura, Wetterauer, Charlotte·2021·GeroPsych

Abstract

Abstract. Assisted suicide (AS) is one of the most controversially discussed topics, both in bioethical academia and in clinical practice. This is especially true for psychiatric patients. In Switzerland, the organization of AS and patient accompaniment in the dying process is practiced by lay right-to-die societies (RTDS). Despite this demedicalization, healthcare professionals are increasingly encountering AS requests in their institutions and experiencing moral uncertainty. This led to a physician’s request for clinical ethics support when confronted with an elderly patient with depression asking for information on AS: When does “assistance” start and what am I supposed and willing to do? The following clinical case report discusses these ethical questions from the perspective of the clinical ethics consultants involved. By recounting and discussing this clinical ethics case, this article aims to illustrate the difficulties that arise in daily practice, the importance of guidance and support in view of controversy, the possibilities of finding pragmatic, acceptable solutions for all parties involved, and what clinical ethics consultation can contribute.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1024/1662-9647/a000259

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MAiD-MD may seem irreconcilable with the valuing of recovery-oriented approaches in mental health care, and some fear that its introduction into the continuum of care will cause a paradigm shift from improving quality of life towards assessing eligibility for MAiD-MD.

    “MAiD-MD may seem irreconcilable with the valuing of recovery-oriented approaches in mental health care [65], and some fear that its introduction into the continuum of care will cause a paradigm shift from a goal of improving quality of life towards a goal of assessing eligibility for MAiD-MD [28].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Winkler, L., & Wetterauer, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Venue
GeroPsych
Published
2021-06
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
57-62
ISSN
  • 1662-9647 (ISSN-L)
  • 1662-971X
OpenAlex
W3133724190
Cited by
3
References
14
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
GeroPsych (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
assisted suicide, depression, clinical ethics consultation, moral uncertainty, physician-assisted death, elderly patients, end-of-life care, bioethics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review