Cited by 462Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Dissociation Following Traumatic Stress: Etiology and Treatment

Schauer, Maggie, Elbert, Thomas·2010·Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology

Abstract

We postulate that the cascade “Freeze-Flight-Fight-Fright-Flag-Faint” is a coherent sequence of six fear responses that escalate as a function of defense possibilities and proximity to danger during life-threat. The actual sequence of trauma-related response dispositions acted out in an extremely dangerous situation therefore depends on the appraisal of the threat by the organism in relation to her/his own power to act (e.g., age and gender) as well as the perceived characteristics of threat and perpetrator. These reaction patterns provide optimal adaption for particular stages of imminence. Subsequent to the traumatic threats, portions of the experience may be replayed. The actual individual cascade of defense stages a survivor has gone through during the traumatic event will repeat itself every time the fear network, which has evolved peritraumatically, is activated again (i.e., through internal or external triggers or, e.g., during exposure therapy).When a parasympathetically dominated ‘‘shut-down’’ was the prominent peri-traumatic response during the traumatic incident, comparable dissociative responses may dominate responding to subsequently experienced threat and may also reappear when the traumatic memory is reactivated. Repeated experience of traumatic stress forms a fear network that can become pathologically detached from contextual cues such as time and location of the danger, a condition which manifests itself as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Intrusions, f…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1027/0044-3409/a000018

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 190 · Cited by 462

Authors
Schauer, M., & Elbert, T.
Affiliations
University of Konstanz (DE)
Venue
Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology
Published
2010-01
Volume
218
Issue
2
Pages
109-127
ISSN
0044-3409 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2143162682
Cited by
462
References
190
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 6
FWCI
10.57
Type
journal article
Language
de
Open access
closed
Locations
Zeitschrift für Psychologie (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
dissociation, traumatic stress, post-traumatic stress disorder, peritraumatic dissociation, parasympathetic dominance, re-experiencing, intrusive memories, hyperarousal, trauma treatment, threat appraisal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review