Cited by 87Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesMental Health via WritingImpact of Technology on Adolescents

An analysis of depression, self-harm, and suicidal ideation content on Tumblr

Open access
Cavazos-Rehg, Patricia A., Krauss, Melissa J., Sowles, Shaina J., Connolly, Sarah, Rosas, Carlos, Bharadwaj, Meghana, Grucza, Richard, Bierut, Laura J.·2017·Crisis

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Social networking about depression can be indicative of self-reported depression and/or can normalize risk behaviors such as self-harm and suicidal ideation. AIM: To gain a better understanding of the depression, self-harm, and suicidal content that is being shared on Tumblr. METHOD: From April 16 to May 10, 2014, 17 popular depression-related Tumblr accounts were monitored for new posts and engagement with other Tumblr users. A total of 3,360 posts were randomly selected from all historical posts from these accounts and coded based on themes ascertained by the research team. RESULTS: The 17 Tumblr accounts posted a median number of 185 posts (range = 0-2,954). Content was engaged with (i.e., re-blogged or liked) a median number of 1,677,362 times (range = 0-122,186,504). Of the 3,360 randomly selected posts, 2,739 (82%) were related to depression, suicide, or self-harm. Common themes were self-loathing (412, 15%), loneliness/feeling unloved (405, 15%), self-harm (407, 15%), and suicide (372, 14%). CONCLUSION: This study takes an important first step at better understanding the displayed depression-related references on Tumblr. The findings signal a need for suicide prevention efforts to intervene on Tumblr and use this platform in a strategic way, given the depression and suicidal content that was readily observed on Tumblr.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1027/0227-5910/a000409

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Themes such as self-loathing, loneliness and feeling unloved were found in content analysis of 3360 randomly selected Tumblr posts from 17 depression-related accounts; 82% of posts were related to depression, suicide or self-harm.

    “Themes such as self-loathing, loneliness and feeling unloved were found in content analysis of 3360 randomly selected Tumblr posts from 17 depression-related accounts; 82% of posts were related to depression, suicide or self-harm [30].”
  • In their analysis of depression-related accounts on Tumblr, Cavazos-Rehg et al. found that 9% of posts involved direct interaction with others and of these, 47% provided emotional support or reassuring messages.

    “In their analysis of depression-related accounts on Tumblr, Cavazos-Rehg et al. [30] found that 9% of posts involved direct interaction with others and of these, 47% provided emotional support or reassuring messages.”
  • There is growing evidence of specific mechanisms by which social media/internet use can be harmful, especially in relation to young people.

    “There is growing evidence of specific mechanisms by which social media/internet use can be harmful, especially in relation to young people.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Park M Cha C Cha M 2012 Depressive moods of users portrayed in Twitter Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD Workshop on Healthcare Informatics (HI-KDD) 2012 1 8
  2. Robinson J Rodrigues M Fisher S Herrman H 2014 Suicide and social media: Findings from the literature review Melbourne, Australia Young and Well Cooperative Research Centre Retrieved from http://www.youngandwellcrc.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Robinson_2014_Suicide-and-Social-Media_Findings-from-the-Literature-Review.pdf

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cavazos-Rehg, P. A., Krauss, M. J., Sowles, S. J., Connolly, S., Rosas, C., Bharadwaj, M., Grucza, R., & Bierut, L. J.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Venue
Crisis
Published
2017-01
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
44-52
ISSN
  • 0227-5910 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-2396
OpenAlex
W2495155713
Cited by
87
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 5
FWCI
14.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Crisis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA039455, R01DA032843)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T34GM008807)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
Tumblr, depression, self-harm, suicidal ideation, suicide prevention, online social networking, user engagement, self-hatred, loneliness, mental health stigma, social media
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Self-Injurious Behavior, Young Adult, Suicidal Ideation, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review