Cited by 26Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesGun Ownership and Violence ResearchPolicing Practices and Perceptions

Suicides of male Portuguese police officers – 10 years of national data.

Costa, Tiago, Passos, Fernando, Queiros, Cristina·2019·Crisis

Abstract

Abstract. Background: Police officers, as first responders to difficult situations with ready access to firearms, are frequently considered to be at increased suicide risk. Aims: We aimed to calculate the suicide rate for male officers of the Portuguese National Police (PSP) and compare it with the Portuguese general population. Method: Retrospective review of the PSP male officers' suicides between 2005 and 2014 and comparison with the suicide rate for the general Portuguese population, adjusted for sex and age. Results: A total of 39 suicides were identified, with 34 using a firearm – mostly the service one (30 cases). The average truncated (20–59 years) suicide rate for male officers was 20.6 per 100,000 person-years (95% CI =14.2–27.1). Over the same period, the rate for the general Portuguese population was 13.9 per 100,000 person-years (95% CI = 13.5–14.3). The standardized rate ratio was 1.5 (95% CI = 0.9–2.4). Limitations: Despite the 10-year period of observation, this is a small sample and there are issues with missing data, such as lack of information for retired or dismissed police officers. Denominators were converted to estimates of person-years observations and we should be mindful of the limitations in the validity of the reported rates. Conclusion: Portuguese male police officers mostly die by suicide using service firearms. The suicide rates among them were not statistically different from those of the sex- and age-adjusted general population. However, given that police officers are healthy workers, we would expect lower rates – thus, similar rates could suggest an increased risk in the study sample.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1027/0227-5910/a000570

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Costa, T., Passos, F., & Queiros, C.
Affiliations
  • Cumbria Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Psychology Unit of the Portuguese National Police, Lisbon, Portugal
  • Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, Portugal
Venue
Crisis
Published
2019-09
Volume
40
Issue
5
Pages
360-364
ISSN
  • 0227-5910 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-2396
OpenAlex
W2911201819
Cited by
26
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Crisis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Gun Ownership and Violence Research
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
Keywords
police officer suicide, firearm suicide, suicide rates, male police officers, occupational suicide risk
MeSH terms
Adult, Firearms, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Portugal, Retrospective Studies, Suicide, Healthy Worker Effect, Police, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review