Cited by 84Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Construction and validation of the Death Anxiety Inventory (DAI)

Tomás-Sábado, Joaquín, Gómez-Benito, Juana·2005·European Journal of Psychological Assessment

Abstract

Background. Over the last 40 years the study of human attitudes toward death has attracted much scientific interest and a significant amount of research has been carried out in the English-speaking world. However, among Spanish-speaking researchers the subject has been practically ignored, as has the issue of related psychometric instruments. The aim of this study was to develop the Death Anxiety Inventory (DAI) and thus provide a valid and reliable assessment instrument for measuring death anxiety among Spanish-speaking subjects. Methods: This study examined the psychometric properties of the DAI. The DAI is a self-administered questionnaire of 20 items that can be used in either a dichotomous true/false format or on a six-point Likert scale. The properties of both scales were investigated by means of six empirical studies and several samples. Results: The scale has an α coefficient of internal consistency of 0.90 and test-retest correlation, at 4 weeks, of 0.94. The correlation with Templer's Death Anxiety Scale was 0.79. Factor analysis of the DAI identified five significant factors. Taken together these factors explained 54.60% of the total variance and were labeled as: (1) Externally generated death anxiety, (2) Meaning and acceptance of death, (3) Thoughts about death, (4) Life after death, and (5) Brevity of life. The English form of the DAI is also presented in the study in order to enable cross-cultural comparisons to be made. Conclusion: Results of this study sugges…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1027/1015-5759.21.2.108

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tomás-Sábado, J., & Gómez-Benito, J.
Affiliations
  • Escola Universitària d'Infermeria Gimbernat, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Spain
  • Facultat de Psicologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain
Venue
European Journal of Psychological Assessment
Published
2005-01
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
108-114
ISSN
  • 1015-5759 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-2426
OpenAlex
W2064904660
Cited by
84
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
European Journal of Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
fear of death, Spanish-speaking populations, psychometric validation, scale development, attitudes toward death, afterlife, cross-cultural comparison, English version

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review