The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Implementing a Five-Factor Personality Inventory for Use on the Internet
Abstract
Abstract. A short five-factor personality inventory developed from the International Personality Item Pool (IPIP) was implemented as an online questionnaire and completed by 2,448 participants. Following factor analyses, a revised version was created with acceptable reliability and factor univocal scales. As preliminary evidence of construct validity, support was found for 25 hypothesized links with self-reports of relevant behaviors and demographic variables. In a replication using a different recruiting strategy to test for differences due to motivational factors, similar results were obtained. This set of scales appears to provide acceptable measures of the Five-Factor Model for use in internet-mediated research.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Personality traits were measured using a five-factor personality inventory validated for use online by Buchanan, Johnson and Goldberg (2005).”
From The online dating romance scam: causes and consequences of victimhood (2014) · cites this paper as Buchanan, Johnson and Goldberg (2005)
In the citing paper
“The literature shows that positive expectations have been associated with better outcomes (46, 47).”
In the citing paper
“Previous studies indicate that if assessments are carried out through the web, psychometric properties may change (47).”
In the citing paper
“some evidence suggests that psychometric properties may change when assessment is conducted via the web [77].”
From An Internet-based treatment for flying phobia (NO-FEAR Airlines): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (2016) · cites this paper as [77]
Citations
Cites
Cohen, J. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155 · Cited by 8,771
(1999) · Cited by 7,995
Handbook of Personality : Theory and Research
Pervin, L. A. (1992) · Cited by 4,543
(1999) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,151
Self-citationGosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. P. (2004) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.59.2.93 · Cited by 2,932
Personality Psychology in Europe
Vera-Bermudez, J., Raad, D. B., de Vries, J., García, A. M. P., Sanchez-Elvita, A., & Heck, G. V. (1997) · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) · Cited by 2,462
Mini-Markers: A Brief Version of Goldberg's Unipolar Big-Five Markers
Saucier, G. (1994) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6303_8 · Cited by 1,785
Handbook of personality psychology
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-1833 · Cited by 1,618
Handbook of personality: Theory and research, 2nd ed.
John, O. P., Robins, R. W., & Pervin, L. A. (1999) · Cited by 1,530
Conceptions and Correlates of Openness to Experience
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1997) · Handbook of Personality Psychology · doi:10.1016/b978-012134645-4/50032-9 · Cited by 1,093
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Bartram, D. (1998, January). Distance assessment: Psychological assessment through the internet . Paper presented at the 1998 British Psychological Society Division of Occupational Psychology Conference, Eastbourne, UK
- Buckley N., 2002, Selection & Development Review, 18, 3
- 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 · DOI · Paper page
- Goldberg, L.R. in press The comparative validity of adult personality inventories: Applications of a consumer testing framework. In S.R. Briggs, J.M. Cheek, & E.M. Donahue (Eds.), Handbook of adult personality inventories. New York: Plenum
- Joinson A.N., 1999, Behavior Research Methods, and Computers,
- Knapp, F. Heidingsfelder, M. (2001). Drop-out analysis: Effects of the survey design. In U.D. Reips & M. Bosnjak (Eds.), Dimensions of internet science (pp.221-230). Lengerich, Germany: Pabst Science Publishers
- Woolhouse, L. Myers, S. (1999, September). Factors affecting sample make-up: Results from an internet-based personality questionnaire . Paper presented at the 1999 British Psychological Society Social Psychology Section Conference, Lancaster, UK
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–303 of 303
The Mutual Influence of Technology and Leadership Behaviors
Heilmann, T., & Reips, U. (2012) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-2172-5.ch017
Sadouskas, A. P. (2011) · OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network)
Measurement Equivalence of Web Surveys Based on Social Media
Zhu, W., Shao, P., & Fang, J. (2012) · WHICEB
Metadata
- Authors
- Buchanan, T., Johnson, J. A., & Goldberg, L. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Westminster (GB)
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Oregon Research Institute (US)
- Venue
- European Journal of Psychological Assessment
- Publisher
- Hogrefe Publishing Group
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 115-127
- ISSN
- 1015-5759 (ISSN-L)
- 2151-2426
- OpenAlex
- W2032601501
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 27
- FWCI
- 20.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- Big Five personality traits, International Personality Item Pool, online research, construct validity, scale reliability, factor structure, self-reported behavior, demographic correlates, participant motivation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
