The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the Pragmatics of Qualitative Assessment
Abstract
Using the example of a project on the assessment of implicit leadership theories, this article aims to describe qualitative content analysis as a systematic, rule-based process of analyzing verbal and textual data (e.g., interviews, group discussions, documents). Steps and typical problems in the qualitative assessment process are addressed and guidelines for decision and action presented. The steps include transcription of interview tapes into raw data, condensing and structuring the data, building and applying a category system, displaying data and results for concluding analyses and interpretation. Necessary checks for securing the quality of the assessment are shown for each step. Ideas for the combination of qualitative and quantitative analyses are presented, and applications of qualitative content analysis in the field of psychological assessment discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maxwell, J. (2009) · The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods · doi:10.4135/9781483348858.n7 · Cited by 1,734
Cited by
A hands-on guide to doing content analysis
Erlingsson, C., & Brysiewicz, P. (2017) · African Journal of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.afjem.2017.08.001 · Cited by 2,358
Theme development in qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis
Vaismoradi, M., Jones, J., Turunen, H., & Snelgrove, S. (2016) · Journal of Nursing Education and Practice · doi:10.5430/jnep.v6n5p100 · Cited by 1,994
How bad are the effects of bad leaders? A meta-analysis of destructive leadership and its outcomes
Schyns, B., & Schilling, J. (2013) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.09.001 · Cited by 1,245
Self-citationAn integrated big data analytics-enabled transformation model: application to health care
Wang, Y., Kung, L., Wang, W. Y. C., & Cegielski, C. G. (2018) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2017.04.001 · Cited by 508
Moretti, F., van Vliet, L., Bensing, J., Deledda, G., Mazzi, M., Rimondini, M., Zimmermann, C., & Fletcher, I. (2011) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.005 · Cited by 451
Metadata
- Authors
- Schilling, J.
- Venue
- European Journal of Psychological Assessment
- Publisher
- Hogrefe Publishing Group
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 28-37
- ISSN
- 1015-5759 (ISSN-L)
- 2151-2426
- OpenAlex
- W2118926625
- Cited by
- 512
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 46.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the Pragmatics of Qualitative Assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1027/1015-5759.22.1.28
- The paper
- Schilling, J. (2006). On the Pragmatics of Qualitative Assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.22.1.28
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.