Cited by 1,245Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorWorkplace Violence and BullyingEmployee Performance and Leadership

How bad are the effects of bad leaders? A meta-analysis of destructive leadership and its outcomes

Open access
Schyns, Birgit, Schilling, Jan·2013·The Leadership Quarterly

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.09.001

Cites

121 of 121 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Abusive supervision is theorised to reduce followers' trust in leaders.

    “The reciprocation of positive exchanges with a leader builds trust. In contrast, if a leader engages in abusive behaviour, it will inevitably reduce followers' trust in leaders. Thus, in accordance with SET, trust decreases over time as a result of unfavourable exchanges with a leader. Abusive supervision represents unpleasant behaviours that can be predicted to contribute to feelings of distrust”

    From A meta-analysis of the role of trust in the leadership- performance relationship (2021) · cites this paper as Schyns & Schilling (2013)

  • Researchers have argued that follower perceptions are critical to include in measures of abusive supervision because leader behavior can only have an effect on followers if it is also perceived by them.

    “researchers have argued that follower perceptions are critical to include in measures of abusive supervision because leader behavior can only have an effect on followers if it is also perceived by them (Schyns and Schilling, 2013).”
  • The lack of a clear leadership approach or a wrong management style can de-motivate employees, kill productivity, and lead to disengagement and turnover.

    “On the other hand, the lack of a clear leadership approach or a wrong management style can de-motivate employees, kill productivity, and lead to disengagement and turnover (Catteeuw et al., 2007;Schyns & Schilling, 2013).”

    From Servant Leadership and Employee Engagement: A Qualitative Study (2022) · cites this paper as Schyns & Schilling, 2013

  • Destructive leadership is defined as voluntary, repeated, and hostile behaviors targeted at followers to harm them and/or the organization.

    “Destructive leadership is defined as voluntary, repeated, and hostile behaviors targeted at followers to harm them and/or the organization (Krasikova et al., 2013; Schyns & Schilling, 2013).”

    From The evolution of leadership: Past insights, present trends, and future directions (2025) · cites this paper as Schyns & Schilling, 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schyns, B., & Schilling, J.
Affiliations
  • Durham University (GB)
  • Hochschule Hannover (DE)
Corresponding author
Schyns, Birgit
Venue
The Leadership Quarterly
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-02
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
138-158
ISSN
1048-9843 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2013875734
Cited by
1,245
References
120
Citations by year
2026: 113 · 2025: 113 · 2024: 110 · 2023: 136 · 2022: 126 · 2021: 143 · 2020: 109 · 2019: 105 · 2018: 87 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 14
FWCI
6.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • The Leadership Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Workplace Violence and Bullying
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Leadership
Keywords
destructive leadership, constructive leadership, leader attitudes, counterproductive work behavior, turnover intention, employee well-being, individual performance, follower outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review