The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Autonomous-Relational Self
Abstract
Autonomy is often construed as separateness from others and is seen to result from a separation-individuation process. However, it is neither logically nor psychologically necessary for autonomy to imply separateness if the existence of the two different dimensions of agency and interpersonal distance are recognized. The two poles of the agency dimension are autonomy and heteronomy; those of the interpersonal distance dimension are separateness and relatedness. The two dimensions are confused when agency is pitted against relatedness. Different family interaction models are examined here in terms of childrearing patterns and the resultant types of (developing) selves. One of these, the autonomous-relational self, is suggested in this article to be a healthy synthesis of the two basic human needs for agency and relatedness. It tends to develop in the family model of emotional interdependence involving authoritative parenting. This family model and self constellation, which are supported by research evidence, involve a different set of theories than are traditionally found in psychology. This conceptualization synthesizes some apparently conflicting patterns of interpersonal relations and the self. It may serve as a corrective to the pervasive emphasis in psychology on individual autonomy at the cost of human relatedness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.98.2.224 · Cited by 21,995
The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud
Freud, S. (1953) · Cited by 17,730
Individualism and Collectivism
(1976) · The Road to Serfdom · doi:10.4324/9780203991718-8 · Cited by 6,058
The Moral Judgment Of The Child
Piaget, J. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315009681 · Cited by 4,372
Civilization and Its Discontents
Freud, S. (2018) · Princeton Readings in Political Thought · doi:10.2307/j.ctv19fvzzk.47 · Cited by 4,247
The Measurement of Independent and Interdependent Self-Construals
Singelis, T. M. (1994) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167294205014 · Cited by 3,605
Review of Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications.
Stalder, D. R. (1996) · Contemporary Psychology: A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.1037/003295 · Cited by 1,353
The Duality of Human Existence
Thurston, B. L., & Bakan, D. (1969) · Review of Religious Research · doi:10.2307/3510925 · Cited by 1,168
Class and Conformity: A Study in Values.
Powers, M. G., & Kohn, M. L. (1970) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2093420 · Cited by 1,110
The use of family theory in clinical practice
Bowen, M. (1966) · Comprehensive Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0010-440x(66)80065-2 · Cited by 895
Cited by
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2006) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00420.x · Cited by 1,642
Chirkov, V., Ryan, R. M., Kim, Y., & Kaplan, U. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.97 · Cited by 1,425
Autonomy and Relatedness in Cultural Context: Implications for Self and Family
Kagitcibasi, C. (2005) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022105275959 · Cited by 1,345
Koepke, S., & Denissen, J. J. A. (2012) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2012.01.001 · Cited by 465
Ryan, R. M., Lynch, M. F., Vansteenkiste, M., & Deci, E. L. (2011) · The Counseling Psychologist · doi:10.1177/0011000009359313 · Cited by 429
Metadata
- Authors
- Kagitçibasi, Ç.
- Venue
- European Psychologist
- Publisher
- Hogrefe Publishing Group
- Published
- 1996-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 180-186
- ISSN
- 1016-9040 (ISSN-L)
- 1878-531X
- OpenAlex
- W1989123442
- Cited by
- 465
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 1.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Autonomous-Relational Self. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1027/1016-9040.1.3.180
- The paper
- Kagitçibasi, Ç. (1996). The Autonomous-Relational Self. European Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.1.3.180
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.