Cited by 3,605Cultural Differences and ValuesSocial and Intergroup PsychologyPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The Measurement of Independent and Interdependent Self-Construals

Singelis, Theodore M.·1994·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

Following concepts introduced by Markus and Kitayama, this study describes the theoretical and empirical development of a scale to measure the strength of an individual's interdependent and independent self-construals. These two images of self are conceptualized as reflecting the emphasis on connectedness and relations often found in non-Western cultures (interdependent) and the separateness and uniqueness of the individual (independent) stressed in the West. It is argued that these two images of self can and do coexist in individuals and that they can be measured. A 24-item Self-Construal Scale measuring two dimensions of self-image is presented. The two distinct dimensions of the scale were supported in confirmatory factor analyses of two multiethnic samples of college students. The scale was found to have satisfactory reliability and validity. Its implications and potential applications are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167294205014

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The interdependent self-construal measure had reliability α = .96 for Americans and .71 for Japanese.

    “The interdependent self-construal measure included 10 items (e.g., “If people in my family fail, I feel responsible”; αs = .96 for Americans, .71 for Japanese; Singelis, 1994).”
  • Goto and colleagues demonstrated that N400 is enhanced when a background scene is incongruent with an object, that this incongruity response was significantly more pronounced for Asians than European Americans, and that the response became weaker for both groups as a function of independent self-construal.

    “Goto et al. (in press) demonstrated that an ERP marker corresponding to the detection of semantic incongruity (N400; Ganis and Kutas, 2003) is enhanced when a background scene in a picture is incongruent with an object featured in the picture.”
  • The strength of an individual's collective self was associated with being under normative control.

    “Trafimow and Finlay (1996) found that the strength of an individual's collective self was associated with being under normative control -scores on a collective self scale (Singelis, 1994) correlated with a tendency for people to be under NC.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singelis, T. M.
Affiliations
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
Corresponding author
Singelis, Theodore M.
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
1994-10
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
580-591
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W2111970288
Cited by
3,605
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 126 · 2025: 182 · 2024: 144 · 2023: 146 · 2022: 188 · 2021: 206 · 2020: 257 · 2019: 168 · 2018: 167 · 2017: 161 · 2016: 154 · 2015: 181 · 2014: 152 · 2013: 140 · 2012: 134
FWCI
25.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
self-construal, independent self-construal, interdependent self-construal, Self-Construal Scale, self-image, cross-cultural personality, Western and non-Western cultures, scale development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review