The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Strategies for Promoting Proenvironmental Behavior: Lots of Tools but Few Instructions
Abstract
Environmental problems have their origins in human behavior, and as a result, any solution to environmental issues will require changes in behavior. While many disciplines in the social and behavioral sciences offer important perspectives on the behaviors linked with environmental problems, the study of the individual brings a focus on cognitive, social, and motivational processes that provides insights into effective ways to promote change. Psychological research on proenvironmental behavior dates back nearly 40 years, and within this rich body of empirical research are a number of well-established findings. Strategies such as prompts, commitments, feedback, social norms, incentives, and convenience have all been shown to effectively promote proenvironmental behavior – at least in some contexts, for some behaviors, and for some individuals. This article begins with a brief overview of these research findings, and then proceeds to examine the less-explored question about when various strategies work. The article concludes with recommendations for selecting an appropriate strategy for promoting behavior change, along with fruitful areas for future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda
Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004 · Cited by 5,089
Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002 · Cited by 4,140
A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation
Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Rothengatter, T. (2005) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.002 · Cited by 2,668
Normative social influence is underdetected
Nolan, J. M., Schultz, P. W., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2008) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167208316691 · Cited by 1,772
Self-citation
Cited by
How to SHIFT Consumer Behaviors to be More Sustainable: A Literature Review and Guiding Framework
White, K., Habib, R., & Hardisty, D. J. (2019) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/0022242919825649 · Cited by 2,386
Spillover effects in environmental behaviors, across time and context: a review and research agenda
Nilsson, A., Bergquist, M., & Schultz, W. P. (2017) · Environmental Education Research · doi:10.1080/13504622.2016.1250148 · Cited by 365
Call for testing interventions to prevent consumer food waste
Stöckli, S., Niklaus, E., & Dorn, M. (2018) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.03.029 · Cited by 230
Direct and mediated impacts of social norms on pro-environmental behavior
Helferich, M., Thøgersen, J., & Bergquist, M. (2023) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102680 · Cited by 191
Chamberlin, L., & Boks, C. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10062070 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Schultz, P. W.
- Venue
- European Psychologist
- Publisher
- Hogrefe Publishing Group
- Published
- 2014-01-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 107-117
- ISSN
- 1016-9040 (ISSN-L)
- 1878-531X
- OpenAlex
- W1944433416
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 30.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strategies for Promoting Proenvironmental Behavior: Lots of Tools but Few Instructions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1027/1016-9040/a000163
- The paper
- Schultz, P. W. (2014). Strategies for Promoting Proenvironmental Behavior: Lots of Tools but Few Instructions. European Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000163
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.