The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Misunderstanding Reliability
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“we need to measure the extent of agreement among independent replications in order to estimate whether we can trust the generated data in subsequent analyses”
From Exploring Differences in Measurement and Reporting of Classroom Observation Inter-Rater Reliability (2018) · cites this paper as Krippendorff, 2016
In the citing paper
“Further, many studies use incorrect statistical indices to compute consensus or consistency, misinterpret the results from reliability analyses, or fail to consider the implications that reliability estimates have on subsequent analyses (Hallgren, 2012;Krippendorff, 2016).”
From Exploring Differences in Measurement and Reporting of Classroom Observation Inter-Rater Reliability (2018) · cites this paper as Krippendorff, 2016
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 17 · Cited by 22
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- 10.1086/266520 · DOI
- 10.1177/001316446002000104 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/h0026256 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0895-4356(90)90158-L · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s11135-012-9807-z · DOI
- 10.1007/s11135-012-9745-9 · DOI
- 10.1027/1614-2241/a000086 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0031619 · DOI · Paper page
- Gustafson P., 2004, Measurement error and misclassification in statistics and epidemiology: Impacts and Bayesian Adjustments
- Gwet K. L., 2002, Statistical Methods for Inter-Rater Reliability, 1, 1
- 10.1080/19312450709336664 · DOI · Paper page
- Klemens B., 2012, Journal of Official Statistics, 28, 395
- 10.1177/300001316447003000105 · DOI
- 10.1002/bs.3830160305 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1468-2958.3042004.tb00738.x · DOI
- 10.1080/19312458.2011.568376 · DOI
- Krippendorff K., 2013, Content analysis. An introduction to its Methodology
- 10.2307/2532051 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/266577 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Krippendorff, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Corresponding author
- Krippendorff, Klaus
- ORCID
- Krippendorff, Klaus
- Venue
- Methodology
- Publisher
- Hogrefe Publishing Group
- Published
- 2016-10
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 139-144
- ISSN
- 1614-1881 (ISSN-L)
- 1614-2241
- OpenAlex
- W4254697198
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 0.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Methodology (publishedVersion)
- ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
- Keywords
- reliability statistics, measurement reliability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
