Cited by 4,225Reliability and Agreement in MeasurementComputational and Text Analysis MethodsPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data

Hayes, Andrew F., Krippendorff, Klaus·2007·Communication Methods and Measures

Abstract

In content analysis and similar methods, data are typically generated by trained human observers who record or transcribe textual, pictorial, or audible matter in terms suitable for analysis. Conclusions from such data can be trusted only after demonstrating their reliability. Unfortunately, the content analysis literature is full of proposals for so-called reliability coefficients, leaving investigators easily confused, not knowing which to choose. After describing the criteria for a good measure of reliability, we propose Krippendorff's alpha as the standard reliability measure. It is general in that it can be used regardless of the number of observers, levels of measurement, sample sizes, and presence or absence of missing data. To facilitate the adoption of this recommendation, we describe a freely available macro written for SPSS and SAS to calculate Krippendorff's alpha and illustrate its use with a simple example.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/19312450709336664

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
Communication Methods and Measures
Published
2007-04
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
77-89
ISSN
  • 1931-2458 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-2466
OpenAlex
W2061504941
Cited by
4,225
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 284 · 2025: 278 · 2024: 280 · 2023: 289 · 2022: 331 · 2021: 379 · 2020: 369 · 2019: 296 · 2018: 260 · 2017: 300 · 2016: 248 · 2015: 205 · 2014: 206 · 2013: 150 · 2012: 107
FWCI
50.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Communication Methods and Measures (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
Krippendorff's alpha, inter-rater reliability, content analysis, coding reliability, reliability coefficients, observer agreement, SAS macro, missing data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review