Longitudinal Associations Among Psychological Issues and Problematic Use of Smartphones: A Two-Wave Cross-Lagged Study
Abstract
Abstract. One of the critical limitations of previous research on the association between problematic use of media and psychological factors is that the proposed causality between them is mostly based on cross-sectional data. Responding to this limitation, the present study investigated longitudinal causality associations among loneliness, problematic use of smartphones, face-to-face interaction, smartphone-mediated communication, and need for social assurance with cross-lagged panel models. The results suggest that loneliness leads to problematic use of smartphones, which reduces face-to-face interaction while increasing need for social assurance. However, need for social assurance fueled by excessive smartphone use is usually not gratified, and eventually leads to greater loneliness.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A longitudinal study showed that loneliness positively predicted levels of problematic smartphone use.
“A longitudinal study also showed that loneliness positively predicted levels of problematic smartphone use (Kim, 2019).”
From Loneliness and problematic mobile phone use among adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic: The roles of escape motivation and self-control (2021) · cites this paper as Kim, 2019
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 61 · Cited by 51
- Authors
- Kim, J.-H.
- Affiliations
- Sogang University (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Kim, Jung-Hyun
- ORCID
- Kim, Jung-Hyun
- Venue
- Journal of Media Psychology
- Publisher
- Hogrefe Publishing Group
- Published
- 2019-07
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 117-127
- ISSN
- 1864-1105 (ISSN-L)
- 2151-2388
- OpenAlex
- W2775638995
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 4.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
- Keywords
- smartphone addiction, loneliness, face-to-face interaction, psychological well-being, smartphone overuse
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review