The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Three‐dimensional propagation of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) in a structured solar wind flow: 1. CME launched within the streamer belt
Abstract
A three‐dimensional (3‐D) numerical hydrodynamic model is used to investigate the temporal and spatial evolution of large‐scale solar wind structures. A tilted‐dipole outflow configuration is specified at the inner boundary near the Sun, and a structured, corotating solar wind (SW) flow is established by dynamic relaxation. Time‐dependent variation of the pressure and velocity at the inner boundary is applied to generate transient structures within the streamer belt. The dynamical interaction of a coronal mass ejection (CME) with the corotating coronal streamer belt flow between 0.14 and 5.04 AU is then investigated. Numerical results show that the motion and appearance of a CME can be strongly affected by its interaction with the velocity and density structure of the background SW. The initial shape and density distribution of the CME is distorted in all dimensions; it is compressed where, the CME is trapped between slow streamer belt and high‐speed coronal hole flows, and it is distended where the CME penetrates into the trailing edge of the preceding high‐speed stream. Thus a given CME can be observed with substantially different properties at different locations; the shock strength as well as the stand‐off distance between the shock front and the CME driver gas can vary considerably across the structure, and the density profile through the disturbance can adopt different forms depending on location. Merging of CME and corotating interaction region shocks and thermodynamic structures as demonstrated in this simulation complicate the interpretation of single‐spacecraft observations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coronal Expansion and Solar Wind
Hundhausen, A. J. (1972) · Physics and chemistry in space · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-65414-5 · Cited by 1,042
Coronal mass ejections and magnetic flux ropes in interplanetary space
Gosling, J. T. (1990) · Geophysical Monograph Series · doi:10.1029/gm058p0343 · Cited by 606
Large-Scale Structure of the Interplanetary Medium
Schwenn, R. (1990) · Physics of the Inner Heliosphere I · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-75361-9_3 · Cited by 390
Gosling, J. T., Asbridge, J. R., Bame, S. J., & Feldman, W. C. (1978) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics · doi:10.1029/ja083ia04p01401 · Cited by 307
COROTATING AND TRANSIENT SOLAR WIND FLOWS IN THREE DIMENSIONS
Gosling, J. T. (1996) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.34.1.35 · Cited by 189
Signatures of shock drivers in the solar wind and their dependence on the solar source location
Richardson, I. G., & Cane, H. V. (1993) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/93ja01466 · Cited by 132
A new class of forward‐reverse shock pairs in the solar wind
Gosling, J. T., McComas, D. J., Phillips, J. L., Weiss, L. A., Pizzo, V. J., Goldstein, B. E., & Forsyth, R. J. (1994) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/94gl02245 · Cited by 128
Self-citation3‐D Simulation of high‐latitude interaction regions: Comparison with Ulysses results
Pizzo, V. J., & Gosling, J. T. (1994) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/94gl01581 · Cited by 94
Self-citationOverexpanding coronal mass ejections at high heliographic latitudes: Observations and simulations
Gosling, J. T., Riley, P., McComas, D. J., et al. (1998) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/97ja01304 · Cited by 93
Pizzo, V. J. (1994) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/93ja03239 · Cited by 83
Self-citation
Cited by
EUHFORIA: European heliospheric forecasting information asset
Pomoell, J., & Poedts, S. (2018) · Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate · doi:10.1051/swsc/2018020 · Cited by 422
Stream structure and coronal sources of the solar wind during the May 12th, 1997 CME
Arge, C. N., Luhmann, J. G., Odstrcil, D., Schrijver, C. J., & Li, Y. (2004) · Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jastp.2004.03.018 · Cited by 340
Numerical simulation of the 12 May 1997 interplanetary CME event
Odstrcil, D., Riley, P., & Zhao, X. P. (2004) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics · doi:10.1029/2003ja010135 · Cited by 311
Space weather: the solar perspective: An update to Schwenn (2006)
Temmer, M. (2021) · Living Reviews in Solar Physics · doi:10.1007/s41116-021-00030-3 · Cited by 283
On space weather consequences and predictions
Feynman, J., & Gabriel, S. B. (2000) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics · doi:10.1029/1999ja000141 · Cited by 153
Metadata
- Authors
- Odstrčil, D., & Pizzo, V. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1999-01
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- A1
- Pages
- 483-492
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3010576176
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 6.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Three‐dimensional propagation of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) in a structured solar wind flow: 1. CME launched within the streamer belt. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/1998ja900019
- The paper
- Odstrčil, D., & Pizzo, V. J. (1999). Three‐dimensional propagation of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) in a structured solar wind flow: 1. CME launched within the streamer belt. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics. https://doi.org/10.1029/1998ja900019
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.