The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Numerical simulation of the 12 May 1997 interplanetary CME event
Abstract
Numerical three‐dimensional magnetohydrodynamic models are capable of predicting large‐scale solar wind structures at Earth, provided that appropriate time‐dependent boundary conditions are specified near the Sun. Since knowledge of such conditions is at present insufficient to directly drive the models, various approximations are used. In this paper, we introduce the main features and approximations of a numerical model where (1) the ambient solar wind is derived from coronal models utilizing photospheric magnetic field observations and (2) transient disturbances are derived from geometrical and kinematic fitting of coronagraph observations of coronal mass ejections (CMEs). We have chosen the well‐defined halo‐CME event of 12 May 1997 as our initial event because it is characterized by a relatively quiet solar and interplanetary background into which the ejecta was launched. The numerical simulation has enabled us to predict the arrival of the shock and ejecta and provided us with a global picture of transient disturbance interacting with a moderately fast solar wind stream.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Arge, C. N., & Pizzo, V. J. (2000) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics · doi:10.1029/1999ja000262 · Cited by 779
Interplanetary coronal mass ejections in the near‐Earth solar wind during 1996–2002
Cane, H. V., & Richardson, I. G. (2003) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2002ja009817 · Cited by 664
Predicting the 1‐AU arrival times of coronal mass ejections
Gopalswamy, N., Lara, A., Yashiro, S., Kaiser, M. L., & Howard, R. A. (2001) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2001ja000177 · Cited by 450
The Origins and Development of the English Language
Barber, C., & Pyles, T. (1967) · The Modern Language Review · doi:10.2307/3722142 · Cited by 381
Magnetohydrodynamic modeling of the solar corona during Whole Sun Month
(1999) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics · doi:10.1029/1998ja900159 · Cited by 338
Odstrčil, D., & Pizzo, V. J. (1999) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics · doi:10.1029/1998ja900019 · Cited by 265
Odstrčil, D., & Pizzo, V. J. (1999) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics · doi:10.1029/1998ja900038 · Cited by 188
Source regions and storm effectiveness of frontside full halo coronal mass ejections
Zhao, X., & Webb, D. F. (2003) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2002ja009606 · Cited by 119
Self-citation
Cited by
EUHFORIA: European heliospheric forecasting information asset
Pomoell, J., & Poedts, S. (2018) · Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate · doi:10.1051/swsc/2018020 · Cited by 422
Stream structure and coronal sources of the solar wind during the May 12th, 1997 CME
Arge, C. N., Luhmann, J. G., Odstrcil, D., Schrijver, C. J., & Li, Y. (2004) · Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jastp.2004.03.018 · Cited by 340
Self-citationWitasse, O., Sánchez‐Cano, B., Mays, M. L., Kajdič, P., Opgenoorth, H., Elliott, H. A., Richardson, I. G., Zouganelis, I., Zender, J., Wimmer‐Schweingruber, R. F., et al. (2017) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics · doi:10.1002/2017ja023884 · Cited by 126
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Odstrcil, D., Riley, P., & Zhao, X. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2004-02
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- A2
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2093111737
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 6.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Numerical simulation of the 12 May 1997 interplanetary CME event. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2003ja010135
- The paper
- Odstrcil, D., Riley, P., & Zhao, X. P. (2004). Numerical simulation of the 12 May 1997 interplanetary CME event. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003ja010135
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
