Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 188

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Three‐dimensional propagation of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) in a structured solar wind flow: 2. CME launched adjacent to the streamer belt

Odstrčil, D., Pizzo, V. J.·1999·Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics

Abstract

A three‐dimensional (3‐D) numerical hydrodynamic model is used to investigate the evolution of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) launched at several heliographic positions into a tilted‐dipole ambient solar wind (SW) flow, which is appropriate around solar activity minimum and declining phase. The CME is injected as an overpressured plasma cloud. Results show that the motion and local appearance of a CME in interplanetary space is strongly affected by its interaction with the background SW velocity and density structures. The most complicated scenario occurs when a CME is injected directly into the slow stream‐belt flow. Temporal profiles corresponding to the interaction of fast CME and slow SW flows, to the merging of CME‐driven and corotating disturbances at the fast stream leading edge, and to expanding structures at the trailing edge of the preceding fast stream are presented. The simplest configuration is when a CME is injected just to the west of the streamer belt. In that case the CME‐driven disturbance evolves and propagates freely into the preceding fast stream, untouched by the streamer belt slow flow near which it originates, except for a small segment at low latitudes. When a CME is injected just to the east of the streamer belt, the CME expansion and shock evolution are constrained by the slow, dense flow ahead of the fast stream in which the CME propagates initially. Low‐latitude portions of the CME are trapped between the slow streamer belt flow and the leading edge of the oncoming fast stream. In this case, CME‐driven and corotating shock structures can merge. These results are related to a previous study, where the CME is launched into the midst of the slow streamer belt flow. Numerical results confirm recent Ulysses findings about the overexpanding CME structure, the extreme latitudinal distortions in the CME shape, and the inclination of shock fronts. These results also provide a basis for interpreting variations in the radial width of the CME and the shock stand‐off distance. Simulations of spatial structures resulting from 3‐D dynamic interactions help illuminate differing temporal onsets and profiles of observed CMEs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/1998ja900038

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 188

Metadata

Authors
Odstrčil, D., & Pizzo, V. J.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
Published
1999-01
Volume
104
Issue
A1
Pages
493-503
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2001354523
Cited by
188
References
0
FWCI
6.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Three‐dimensional propagation of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) in a structured solar wind flow: 2. CME launched adjacent to the streamer belt. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/1998ja900038
The paper
Odstrčil, D., & Pizzo, V. J. (1999). Three‐dimensional propagation of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) in a structured solar wind flow: 2. CME launched adjacent to the streamer belt. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics. https://doi.org/10.1029/1998ja900038

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.