The DOI matches its Crossref record.
General circulation model simulations of the Mars Pathfinder atmospheric structure investigation/meteorology data
Open accessAbstract
The NASA Ames Mars General Circulation Model is used to interpret selected results from the Mars Pathfinder atmospheric structure instrument/meteorology (ASI/MET) experiment. The present version of the model has an improved soil thermal model, a new boundary layer scheme, and a correction for non‐local thermodynamic equilibrium effects at solar wavelengths. We find good agreement with the ASI/MET entry data if the dust observed at the Pathfinder site is assumed to be distributed throughout the lowest five to six scale heights. This implies that the dust is globally distributed as well. In the lower atmosphere the inversion between 10 and 16 km in Pathfinder's entry profile is likely due to thermal emission from a water ice cloud in that region. In the upper atmosphere (above 50 km), dynamical processes, tides in particular, appear to have a cooling effect and may play an important role in driving temperatures toward the CO 2 condensation temperature near 80 km. Near‐surface air temperatures and wind directions are well simulated by the model by assuming a low surface albedo (0.16) and moderately high soil thermal inertia (336 SI). However, modeled tidal surface pressure amplitudes are about a factor of 2 smaller than observed. This may indicate that the model is not properly simulating interference effects between eastward and westward modes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Clancy, R. T., Sandor, B. J., Wolff, M. J., Christensen, P. R., Smith, M. D., Pearl, J. C., Conrath, B. J., & Wilson, R. J. (2000) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets · doi:10.1029/1999je001089 · Cited by 398
Concentration of H, Si, Cl, K, Fe, and Th in the low‐ and mid‐latitude regions of Mars
Boynton, W. V., Taylor, G. J., Evans, L. G., Reedy, R. C., Starr, R., Janes, D. M., Kerry, K. E., Drake, D. M., Kim, K. J., Williams, R. M. S., et al. (2007) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets · doi:10.1029/2007je002887 · Cited by 351
On the possibility of liquid water on present‐day Mars
Haberle, R. M., McKay, C. P., Schaeffer, J., Cabrol, N. A., Grin, E. A., Zent, A. P., & Quinn, R. (2001) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets · doi:10.1029/2000je001360 · Cited by 314
Self-citationMetastability of Liquid Water on Mars
Hecht, M. (2002) · Icarus · doi:10.1006/icar.2001.6794 · Cited by 310
Clancy, R. T., Wolff, M. J., & Christensen, P. R. (2003) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets · doi:10.1029/2003je002058 · Cited by 309
Metadata
- Authors
- Haberle, R. M., Joshi, M. M., Murphy, J. R., Barnes, J. R., Schofield, J. T., Wilson, G., Lopez‐Valverde, M., Hollingsworth, J. L., Bridger, A. F. C., & Schaeffer, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1999-04
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- E4
- Pages
- 8957-8974
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2061950080
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: General circulation model simulations of the Mars Pathfinder atmospheric structure investigation/meteorology data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/1998je900040
- The paper
- Haberle, R. M., Joshi, M. M., Murphy, J. R., Barnes, J. R., Schofield, J. T., Wilson, G., Lopez‐Valverde, M., Hollingsworth, J. L., Bridger, A. F. C., & Schaeffer, J. (1999). General circulation model simulations of the Mars Pathfinder atmospheric structure investigation/meteorology data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets. https://doi.org/10.1029/1998je900040
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.