Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 314

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

On the possibility of liquid water on present‐day Mars

Haberle, Robert M., McKay, Christopher P., Schaeffer, James, Cabrol, Nathalie A., Grin, Edmon A., Zent, Aaron P., Quinn, Richard·2001·Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets

Abstract

Using a validated general circulation model, we determine where and for how long the surface pressure and surface temperature on Mars meet the minimum requirements for the existence of liquid water in the present climate system: pressures and temperatures above the triple point of water but below the boiling point. We find that for pure liquid water, there are five “favorable” regions where these requirements are satisfied: between 0° and 30°N in the plains of Amazonis, Arabia, and Elysium; and in the Southern Hemisphere impact basins of Hellas and Argyre. The combined area of these regions represents 29% of the planet's surface area. In the Amazonis region these requirements are satisfied for a total integrated time of 37 sols each Martian year. In the Hellas basin the number of degree days above zero is 70, which is well above those experienced in the dry valley lake region of Antarctica. These regions are remarkably well correlated with the location of Amazonian paleolakes mapped by Cabrol and Grin [2000] but are poorly correlated with the seepage gullies found by Malin and Edgett [2000]. In both instances, obliquity variations may play a role. For brine solutions the favorable regions expand and could potentially include most of the planet for highly concentrated solutions. Whether liquid water ever forms in these regions depends on the availability of ice and heat and on the evaporation rate. The latter is poorly understood for low‐pressure CO 2 environments but is likely to be so high that melting occurs rarely, if at all. However, even rare events of liquid water formation would be significant since they would dominate the chemistry of the soil and would have biological implications as well. It is therefore worth reassessing the potential for liquid water formation on present day Mars, particularly in light of recent Mars Global Surveyor observations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2000je001360

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Cited by

See all 314

Metadata

Authors
Haberle, R. M., McKay, C. P., Schaeffer, J., Cabrol, N. A., Grin, E. A., Zent, A. P., & Quinn, R.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets
Published
2001-10
Volume
106
Issue
E10
Pages
23317-23326
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980658479
Cited by
314
References
17
FWCI
4.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the possibility of liquid water on present‐day Mars. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2000je001360
The paper
Haberle, R. M., McKay, C. P., Schaeffer, J., Cabrol, N. A., Grin, E. A., Zent, A. P., & Quinn, R. (2001). On the possibility of liquid water on present‐day Mars. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000je001360

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.